Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YYDRFHFXBYAFPN6BSMP43HOEZOI2OCAB/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "YYDRFHFXBYAFPN6BSMP43HOEZOI2OCAB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/3ANIFY5HERGJ6KJGEMVXWIU5F2FIIUYQ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gary_mayfield (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing",
    "date": "2013-06-11T02:52:11Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QQRDLVZ2SA3JM3ORVDWFSY6NFZYP5GJK/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have used LOTW with satellite contacts for several years.  I even uploaded\nmy old contacts back into the 80's.\n\nI do not know what issues you may have had, but it works great for me.  It\nis seamless with most logging programs.  Just click and the contacts are\nuploaded!\n\nI use n3fjp's ACLog.\n\n73,\nJoe\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of Jim Walls\nSent: Monday, June 10, 2013 5:25 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing\n\nOn 6/10/2013 14:21, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote (in small part):\n\n> But, as N5AFV mentioned earlier, we satellite operators should file \n> for this award. Even if all it does is show ARRL that we're out here. \n> 73! Patrick\n\n\nI have not been satellite active for several years (mostly because of no \nbirds to actually talk through for more than 3 seconds at a time).  LOTW \nwas fairly new when I stopped operating satellite, but at that time the \ngeneral comment from those that were using LOTW was that particularly \nfor satellite operations, LOTW was such a pain to use, and really did \nnot support satellite ops without putting in incorrect data (it did not \nunderstand our cross band operation or that there are actually more than \none satellite in use).  Maybe someone who is using it currently can \nadvise if works better for satellite operations now.  One of these days \nI will get back on the birds, but I do have several thousand satellite \nQSOs that I could log from years back if there were really any reason to \ndo so.\n\n-- \n73\n-------------------------------------\nJim Walls - K6CCC\[email protected]\nOfc:  818-548-4804\nhttp://members.dslextreme.com/users/k6ccc/\nAMSAT Member 32537 - WSWSS Member 395\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}