Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YZB6SPSLFIIAELF5E6IFJSO4WTRZGUCQ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "000801c6d2c5$406b4540$0200a8c0@Tanguray",
    "message_id_hash": "YZB6SPSLFIIAELF5E6IFJSO4WTRZGUCQ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/FEBDCQJ3PAKZ6UFGO4JPZNHRAZYXDDMR/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger Kolakowski",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E",
    "date": "2006-09-07T21:33:24Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QHORL2YKMEQ24TZXBIGJU2DYPGFMUEWO/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/64JDZMCG25LKADEIB5M7LIFST7PV4HTV/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Didn't they just \"survey\" the membership one year ago? If the surveys aren't\ngoing to be on topic or considered in the final decision as to band\npreference, why not save the money for more worthwhile ventures?\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Steve Meuse\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"Andrew Glasbrenner\" <[email protected]>\nCc: \"'AMSAT'\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 4:19 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E\n\n\n> Andrew Glasbrenner expunged ([email protected]):\n>\n> > Everyone knows I'm a big supporter of AMSAT, but I gotta call it as I\nsee\n> > it. It makes me think of \"bait and switch\" to collect money for a\nproject\n> > featuring such a popular mode and then drop it.\n>\n> I'm somewhat glad that AO40 ended up with it's only downlink on S band. It\nforced me to educate myself on microwaves. Thanks to that unfortunate\naccident, I'm now active on all bands up to 10Ghz.\n>\n> When I saw the latest band layout I was dissapointed.\n>\n> I know the builders have a constant struggle between building something\nthat is usable vs. something that advances the state of the art. I just\nthink that the majority of people realized that S band was easy, therefore\nvery usable. CC Rider was a huge step forward for us, even if it wasn't\neventually doable. Going back to V/U modes seems to me taking a step\nbackward to me.\n>\n> I don't want to seem negative, I really appreciate every ounce of work the\nbuilders put in, I just think maybe they need to take a little more input\nfrom the active community before the set things in motion.\n>\n>\n> -Steve\n> N1JFU\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}