Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Z6NJ2WLODWJHXLBKZJBYRGNHOBN37CZZ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "Z6NJ2WLODWJHXLBKZJBYRGNHOBN37CZZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7HTM3QQG5NTVLACF3NQK2TTQMFPR6UWU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wb4gcs (a) wb4gcs.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Jim Sanford",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] going digital",
    "date": "2014-07-21T22:34:42Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MWRCB3NAJV7EM7GL4P734D4IXJX5MNBH/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/B35EYYWEILWFRCURPLLS2PAI35GIVTTN/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Look at what the FunCube guys did!\n\nOn 7/21/2014 5:00 PM, Gus wrote:\n> On 07/21/2014 01:00 PM, Phil Karn wrote:\n>\n>  > Next questions:\n>  >\n>  > Does a DirecTV receiving station cost $5K?\n>\n> Actually, DirecTV is not available for purchase in my neck of the \n> woods.  I can get a system installed, but it wouldn't be my system to \n> fiddle with.\n>\n>  > Are its components hard to source or esoteric?\n>\n> Well, I know where I could nick one, but I'd rather not. Otherwise, I \n> guess I could source one overseas, ship it in, then bow down before \n> the Customs & Excise godlings.....  ham gear is 10 + 17.5% but there's \n> no way they'd pass that as ham gear, so probably 115 + 17.5% or \n> worse.  That might satisfy Rx needs, but wouldn't include a \n> transmitter....  Does that sound hard to source or esoteric?\n>\n>  > If not, what makes you think that a digital ground station for an \n> AMSAT satellite should be?\n>\n> Phil, I'm not saying it /should/ be, but that if it is, you won't get \n> many users on the system.  So, part of the system design for any such \n> bird had better include design of low cost, easy to find, simple to \n> use hardware that will allow me -- or any other doofus like me -- to \n> get QRV without too much hardship.\n>\n\n\n---\nThis email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.\nhttp://www.avast.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}