Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZBGTPOBL4OWUIOWNBMDCCMSMMPXAG4BD/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ZBGTPOBL4OWUIOWNBMDCCMSMMPXAG4BD",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZBGTPOBL4OWUIOWNBMDCCMSMMPXAG4BD/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ross (a) topwire.co.nz",
        "mailman_id": "d9ef72508cbd4a2b812c57a87b7ef26a",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/d9ef72508cbd4a2b812c57a87b7ef26a/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Ross Whenmouth",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] HEO opertunity",
    "date": "2016-10-25T06:19:56Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi,\n\nI am thinking along the lines of K.I.S.S - a simple \"bent pipe\" linear \ntransponder, with as little to go wrong as possible (the bird will be in \nGTO for a very long time). Power and link budget permitting (eg a 5 GHz \n/ 10 GHz machine), a wideband transponder would permit ranging \nexperiments, high speed data and video modes in addition to CW & SSB...\n\nCan the attitude of a 1U cubesat in GTO be passively stabilised (gravity \ngradient?) to keep the antennae pointing towards nadir?\n\nIs a microprocessor (or any digital logic) strictly required? simply \nhaving the transponder run whenever the arming pin is out (pulled by \nejection from the cubesat canister) and the DC volts are high enough, \nwould eliminate the need for a rad-hard processor. As far as I am aware, \nthe RF circuits in a \"rock locked\" (no PLL) linear transponder are not \nas prone to SEU induced latchup as digital circuitry.\n\n73 ZL2WRW\nRoss Whenmouth\n",
    "attachments": []
}