Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZCYL66HMFMNDEMPWY3Y3VSJYAZ5YPTUN/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAG5zY2qwYMw1ujLVyz9njMFuYhOH9BiEELJm7uWSbuYr=dPz6A@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "ZCYL66HMFMNDEMPWY3Y3VSJYAZ5YPTUN",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GR5HKBO4LTEP36WTRBBE7CH3UGW3V6CF/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kdcarlso (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "fe1c8f6e808f47a18ae42a370c13a33a",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fe1c8f6e808f47a18ae42a370c13a33a/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave .",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Radio selection: FT-818 vs IC-7100",
    "date": "2018-08-30T16:53:20Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GR5HKBO4LTEP36WTRBBE7CH3UGW3V6CF/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Y3BRDWV4LRI2F27S4LQIUTIAYHXVDIZN/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I've had a 7100 for about four years now and love it. The menus are easy to\nuse and it has DSTAR which I enjoy. I'm just getting it setup with a\nSDRPlay as a RX to use it for portable satellite operation. I used it as my\nbase for a few years and then bought a 9100. Now it's my primary\nmobile/portable radio.  MTC has them on sale for labor day, after rebate\n$779.00\nhttps://www.mtcradio.com/icom-ic-7100-160-10-meters-6m-2m-440-mhz-12-vdc-w-dstar-779-after-mir-sale/\n\n\n\nDave\nN2OA\n\nOn Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:29 AM Daniel Holmes <[email protected]>\nwrote:\n\n> Hi everyone, time for another “what radio is right for me” thread. I\n> haven’t seen one compare these two: IC-7100 and an FT-818. Primarily\n> looking at satellite work, but I’m also interested in HF digital (primarily\n> FT8). I’ve already got an Arrow antenna, and a potatoFeng. Right now I use\n> an SDR to receive, and CubicSDR works pretty well for that-I’ve gotten\n> adept at moving the tuning while using the Armstrong method of Alt/Az\n> locating. I haven’t tried transmitting, just because my HT has pretty poor\n> transmit characteristics. So I feel I’m pretty good on the full duplex\n> issue.\n>\n> Cost isn’t an issue, with the current rebate on the IC-7100 they are close\n> enough to not matter. And the accessories needed will balance out (for the\n> Icom, tuner and power supply, for the Yaesu, tuner, and signalink-I have an\n> adequate power supply).\n>\n> For the short term (6 months or so) most of my satellite operating is\n> going to be from a card table in the back yard, or portable. HF will be a\n> little more permanent, so each radio will have to be disconnected, moved,\n> and setup again for satellite stuff. That’s the paralysis—the FT will\n> probably be easier to move, but the IC is more sensitive.\n>\n> So I think my criteria is coming down to ergonomics of operating vs\n> sensitivity and HF power. I use MacDoppler for tracking, and will probably\n> rely on it for downlink shift on the radios, with my SDR as backup. Oh, I\n> already do QRP CW on 20, so I’m not too nervous about power of the 818.\n>\n> Thanks,\n> Dan\n>\n> Sent from my iPad. Fewer misspellings, more errors.\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}