Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZF5AYZOI3S6LCGOSJZDHHWHH3K2CHTOM/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZF5AYZOI3S6LCGOSJZDHHWHH3K2CHTOM/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ZF5AYZOI3S6LCGOSJZDHHWHH3K2CHTOM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/C6PVYGVN5YEX6JNUO34GD4QZVCEZDDBW/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "top_gun_canada (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "B J",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Atlantis Now In Orbit",
    "date": "2011-07-08T16:45:53Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NVBKAJCALKPJG7OZ5B6TSMXOV3TGVKEX/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D7TRZJQLW5P4LCW3QAGA43T6SF5LHYT2/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZF5UJD5O7LLZF5UT4EM63HWFNJUK4IR3/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\n--- On Fri, 7/8/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n<snip>\n\n> The glitch was a non confirmation of the gaseous vent arm\n> retract. They turned a camera to it and validated that it\n> had in fact retracted and resumed the count from there.\n> about a 2 minute hold. \n\nI heard that being mentioned.\n\nI was surprised, however, that the count resumed at T-31 seconds where it was halted.  I thought that it would be restarted at a point earlier in the sequence, such as T-9 minutes.  I don't ever recall a launch, even as far back as Mercury, in which a countdown was stopped so close to ignition and then continued from where it left off.\n\n> A nominal launch, good enough to eliminate the OMS-1 Burn.\n\nI noticed that.\n\nIt's too bad that there was no live TV transmission of the ET separation seen from the tank itself.  I always liked the view of the orbiter heading off.\n\n<snip>\n\n\n> > There was a glitch just as control was about to be\n> handed over to the on-board computers but, others than that,\n> it was a good launch.\n\n\n73s\n\nBernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL\n",
    "attachments": []
}