Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZQXFVRFVCVCTCOHZ74BMVXQG72T3KWIO/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ZQXFVRFVCVCTCOHZ74BMVXQG72T3KWIO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GNHZFZCHHWGG2UOHFYAIXF5SUFTFGH5Z/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k.alexander (a) rogers.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Ken Alexander",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Re-entry predictions for BY70-1",
    "date": "2017-01-30T00:43:27Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5LLXBFUFCI7FU3JEWDJQUFRAEXSQCHOS/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Only Mr. Spock could answer that!\n\n73,\n\nKen\nVE3HLS\n\n\nOn 2017-01-29 7:35 PM, Scott wrote:\n> So, if you happen to be on a border between two grid squares & you \n> make a satellite contact that becomes a meteor scatter contact, do you \n> just sit back and watch your logging program explode?\n>\n> -Scott,  K4KDR\n>\n> ==========================================================\n>\n> -----Original Message----- From: Ken Alexander\n> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 7:23 PM\n> To: [email protected]\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re-entry predictions for BY70-1\n>\n> A unique meteor scatter opportunity!\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Ken\n> VE3HLS\n>\n>\n> On 2017-01-29 5:51 PM, Mac A. Cody wrote:\n>> Todd and Joe,\n>>\n>> Given that BY70-1 is a 2U cubesat measuring 10x10x20cm and weighing\n>> only a few kilograms (details here:\n>> https://amsat-uk.org/2016/12/27/by70-1-fm-transponder-satellite/),\n>> it will completely burn up upon reentry.  When and where it will\n>> burn up, of course, depends on the orbital dynamics, atmospheric\n>> conditions (the sun's radiation affects the height of the top of the\n>> atmosphere), and the satellite cross-section.  The eventual demise may\n>> be over one of the oceans or a cloudy region, with no one present or\n>> able to witness it.\n>>\n>> Since BY70-1 is reported to have 3-axis stabilization, we may be\n>> able to enjoy its use right up to its fiery end.  I have been trying\n>> to work BY70-1 as much as my other responsibilities will allow. I\n>> encourage all to do the same.\n>>\n>> 73,\n>>\n>> Mac / AE5PH\n>>\n>> On 01/29/2017 10:07 AM, Todd Deckard wrote:\n>>> Greetings Joe!\n>>>\n>>> space-track.org lists the decay epoch as 2017-02-22 0:00:00 -- note \n>>> this is not strictly the re-entry time but perhaps gives us an \n>>> approximate window?\n>>>\n>>> I do not understand the material very well.  It appears for large \n>>> objects they will calculate a time-and-impact prediction as things \n>>> become more certain but perhaps poor Bayi-Kepu-Weixing-1 may not \n>>> rate as it doesn't pose a hazard.\n>>>\n>>> I don't even know if it would be visible during re-entry given the \n>>> speed?\n>>>\n>>>> When will we have a closer idea of when it may re-enter?\n>>>>\n>>>> It would be neat to try to catch it on video.\n>>>>\n>>>> Joe WB9SBD \n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. \n> Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views \n> of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}