Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZWIQOEOZQ3HNOCBUEMA3F45FTUASVXAD/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ZWIQOEOZQ3HNOCBUEMA3F45FTUASVXAD",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/M2TJEKWA7M2GRP66UUXLPWTDO64AYGJV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "the2belo (a) msd.biglobe.ne.jp",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "J. Boyd (JR2TTS)",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Simple logic - STOP CALLING!",
    "date": "2016-02-23T22:40:53Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FXYPMQFWQPY73PT424MD7F6WVHG4SNG2/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:17:41 -0800, Bryan KL7CN <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Agree, Clayton.\n> \n> To me, the best approach is to be a good example when live on the satellites.\n> \n> There have been times when I have sent a note to an obviously new\n> operator after a pass. The tone of the note is encouragement, with some\n> examples of how things are done most efficiently (no CQ, no signal\n> report, listening for a second or two after talking). That kind of\n> written admonition seems to work best.\n\nIf I may add my own still-meager experiences, because they have been\nsignificantly different from the prevailing \"culture\" of satellite\noperation in the United States.\n\nI operate in Japan (PM85jl) and have worked SO-50, AO-85, and FO-29 so\nfar. FO-29 is rather straightforward, being a SSB bird and as such is\napproached in the same fashion as 2m SSB phone on the ground (find a\nclear frequency, call/send CQ, exchange RS(T) and QTH). But while I have\nnot yet worked any FM satellite from the US side, operating practices\nare apparently different from those I have observed over here -- in\nJapan, China, Korea, and Russia, you will often hear CQs and signal\nreport exchanges (always 59, of course), and nobody gives grid locators.\nJA domestic contacts will exchange JCC numbers, but I have never\nobtained a grid locator from anyone, so eventually I stopped giving mine.\n\nI also notice that FM sat passes, even SO-50 on a sunny Saturday\nafternoon, are less hectic than what everybody describes the US\nexperience to be. I end up working the same people over and over, so\nexchanges turn out to be more of the \"oh hi Bob, nice hearing you again\"\nvariety. I hope I can shake that mentality the next time I go to the US\nand take a stab at working SO-50 from there, because it seems an\nentirely different way of operating.\n\nRegardless of which country I'm in, I still can't seem to wrap my head\naround the concept of right-of-way on an FM bird. I want lots of\ncontacts, but I also don't want to hog the repeater. I throw my callsign\nout when I can, but if there are a lot of callers I usually shut up to\navoid stepping on anyone, and end up with two or three contacts in 12\nminutes. It's like walking through a room full of cats -- I'm so\nconcentrated on not stepping on any tails that I get nothing else done.\n\n\n-- \nJ. Boyd, JR2TTS/NI3B\[email protected]\nhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/the2belo/\nhttp://www.qrz.com/db/JR2TTS\nTwitter: @Minus2_C\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}