Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZWTCIXQXHEW3QNREJN66CCZDOOGC3PVU/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "1D1B1A305A74424BBF3BC13B24241269@WA4SCA",
    "message_id_hash": "ZWTCIXQXHEW3QNREJN66CCZDOOGC3PVU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JINH36STZSVCFQI4KGKDNOUFCDWY7JJH/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "APBIDDLE (a) UNITED.NET",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Alan P. Biddle",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: M Square 436CP30",
    "date": "2008-06-29T11:52:31Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JINH36STZSVCFQI4KGKDNOUFCDWY7JJH/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Jim,\n\nThat lack of attention to detail was my experience as well with the\n436CP42UG.  I also had to cut one element to size.  \n\nIn addition, the instruction sheets for the CP switching assembly cover both\nmodels of the beam, in theory.  However, there are some very significant\ndifferences in how to run the phasing lines, and the manual, dating for\n2000, is simply incorrect for the larger beam.  After a lot of head\nscratching, and repeated unanswered e-mail, I called and got someone who\npulled their copies, which were also wrong.  We finally got it sorted out,\nand he said he would try to get the documentation updated.  That was 2 years\nago.  If you bought the 70-CP switching assembly, I would be very interested\nto know whether the docs have been updated from the 2000 version.\n\n73s,\n\nAlan\nWA4SCA\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}