Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZYBNC6XQ6WQ2AJZEL7S6J7R425HJ2XIU/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ZYBNC6XQ6WQ2AJZEL7S6J7R425HJ2XIU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZYBNC6XQ6WQ2AJZEL7S6J7R425HJ2XIU/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k5gm (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": "af784b872c3e415d98580d0b5762b6ea",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/af784b872c3e415d98580d0b5762b6ea/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Peter Jordahl",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  IC-970 vs. newer rigs",
    "date": "2009-12-01T00:33:56Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VLN3NP6JKPI6CAZKRBWGRAE46I7PHLC5/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Have been following the \"910H vs. TS-2000\" thread.  Wonder how the older\nIC-970A (good in its day) compares with these newer rigs,\nacknowledging the lower power (25W) and lack of any DSP in the receiver.\n My 970A is currently in semi-storage waiting for me to have the\nold-style trimmer capacitors replaced; the synthesizer no longer locks\non 70 cm.  Hope to get that done soon.  \n\nAny suggestions as to the best repair site for an older ICOM rig\nwelcome; I already know about MTS and absent  any really glowing\nalternative suggestions will probably send it there.\n\nPete K5GM\nAMSAT LM-1618\nPete Jordahl, K5GM\[email protected]\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}