Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZZMSGHRPQO5U4HQN73YE7UL5FY6HU7WV/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ZZMSGHRPQO5U4HQN73YE7UL5FY6HU7WV",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/66EMMHN5IGYXLOGFASY7FYNPLODA6HZK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: \"\"you may as well use Skype...\"",
    "date": "2011-02-04T19:11:36Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TDF5HC7XYQJALNRSE6LX7DQX3CA6X3OZ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 02:18 AM 2/5/2011, Diane Bruce wrote:\n>On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:03:59AM +0000, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:\n> > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 13:49 -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:\n> >\n> > > >\n>...\n> > It doesn't in my case.  I have *no interest at all* in operating\n> > satellites that require a complex fixed station with computer tracking\n> > and tuning.  None.  Doesn't interest me one bit.\n>\n>Which is why I was interested in AO-40, for all the same reasons.\n>However, since I had already invested in setting up an AO-40 station,\n>I might as well use it.\n\nI'm certainly not interested in automated tracking, due to the cost \nand mechanical complexity.  I'm not good with anything mechanically \ncomplex.  AO-40 offered simple antenna pointing, which was one of its \nattractions.  Computer controlled tuning, I can manage that.\n\n\n> > The fun part is communicating via simple inexpensive satellites, with\n> > simple inexpensive hardware that you can make at home.  Really, you\n>\n>Well, sure no disagreement from me on that. But I would suggest a one\n>design fits all idea. Make a simple simple satellite design that\n>could be assembled in near mass production quantities, get them into\n>orbit whenver opportunities prsent themselves.\n\nThis was suggested some time back for linear transponders, to make \nthem available to the university groups building small satellites, so \nmore linear birds would make it to LEO.\n\n>Well, instead of thinking HEO for the time being, one simple design\n>tossed up multiple times, on the same frequency pairs, to minimise\n>tracking efforts is the way to go.\n\nWorth a thought.  a constellation of LEOs could be quite \nuseful.  There might be some interference issues to consider, though \nin some circumstances, Doppler can mitigate some of these \nissues.  SSB also has advantages here too, no capture effect.\n\n73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}