Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "007001c6e618$7cab6a10$643aa8c0@notepad8",
    "message_id_hash": "2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "eagle (a) howardlong.com",
        "mailman_id": "a9c59876bf364a4fb3565b10d9755577",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/a9c59876bf364a4fb3565b10d9755577/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Howard Long",
    "subject": "[eagle]  The thorny issue of SDX/Analog linear transpnder",
    "date": "2006-10-02T11:47:06Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DD6P3E2B6GFLUZYXJWXCER7AV34CKJIK/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Folks\n\nI know that the current documented thinking is to have two SDX's and no\nanalog transponder, however we did say we'd bring up for discussion at a\ntelecon prior to the Symposium. I know that this was brought up in July 2005\nwhere it was clear that the answer to the members was yes, we'd have a\nbackup _analog_ linear transponder.\n\nAs we won't now have an opportunity to discuss this in a telecon, can we\nhave a clear line on this? I can just see that someone's gonna ask me this\nquestion at my presentation.\n\n73, Howard G6LVB\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}