Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3MVFGVB42VBOAQJ4DVYEWXGLJHRUHCUH/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "3MVFGVB42VBOAQJ4DVYEWXGLJHRUHCUH",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kk7p (a) wavecable.com",
        "mailman_id": "ecaeda8313f54fe6b33b16a345e6ba3a",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/ecaeda8313f54fe6b33b16a345e6ba3a/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Lyle Johnson",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: The thorny issue of SDX/Analog linear transpnder",
    "date": "2006-10-03T16:20:14Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GFEXBLZJIN7ZWKRBBN7BTGN3JQ5QCBMU/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello Matt!\n\n>>> I know that the current documented thinking is to have two SDX's and no\n>>> analog transponder, however we did say we'd bring up for discussion at a\n>>> telecon prior to the Symposium. I know that this was brought up in \n>>> July 2005\n>>> where it was clear that the answer to the members was yes, we'd have a\n>>> backup _analog_ linear transponder.\n>>>   \n> Why stop there?  We should have a backup to the analog transponder in \n> the form of a CW transponder.  Then we can back that up with a spark \n> transponder.  Finally, we should have some sort of semaphores or smoke \n> signals to back that up.\n\nWe tried smoke signals with AO-40.  The results weren't pretty...\n\nWe've flown analog transpodners for years, and complained about them for \nat least as many years.  If we have an analog backup, we won' t have to \nwrite code to simulate the poor performance (AGC capture, etc.), we can \nlet people experience it for themselves :-)\n\n> Seriously, if we have 2 SDX's, aren't they backups for each other?\n\nIt's a concern about radiation, I think, more than anything else. \nPersonally, I'm happy to leave it out.  The SDX concept is no longer \njust a power point presentation and associated hand waving, it is \nworking demo-ware, and improving with time.\n\nLyle\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}