Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6R4L6O5G6XSJVYXCBPIXXAEWG52K7FPT/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6R4L6O5G6XSJVYXCBPIXXAEWG52K7FPT/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "6R4L6O5G6XSJVYXCBPIXXAEWG52K7FPT", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/OTYTGCXZIN2XPHIPEAYAFQ632QSDABAZ/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "matt (a) ettus.com", "mailman_id": "fcfbe2ace2e140b5be16e4b6f8dcea6b", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fcfbe2ace2e140b5be16e4b6f8dcea6b/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Matt Ettus", "subject": "[eagle] Re: Team Speak tomorrow night", "date": "2006-09-12T01:22:27Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OTYTGCXZIN2XPHIPEAYAFQ632QSDABAZ/?format=api", "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DXZZOPKQHBNCCBZMAWAAMYTSWGDYL5BC/?format=api", "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EUGB7IPAPCP3HDTKOMU732NJBV4E34XE/?format=api" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "\n> We offer that anyone willing can develop and submit for \n>testing and qualification a stand-alone L/S transponder to fly in one of \n>the TSFR slots, using fixed antennas. It would be usable at/near \n>Apogee, like the microwave packages on AO-13 and A)-40. What do you \n>think? Les's discuss this.\n> \n>\nBad idea. We discussed having ONE SDX transponder and ONE digital \ncommunications payload. If for some reason it is decided that the DCP \nis on neither S1 nor L (which itself would be a bad idea...), AND it was \ndecided that there was a desire for old-style transponders on L/S, then \nit makes sense to build it as part of the SDX, and not have a THIRD payload.\n\nMatt\n", "attachments": [] }