Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7J4ZYOJ63ORHJWIMGTZQNFKGX4U5Q2N7/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "7J4ZYOJ63ORHJWIMGTZQNFKGX4U5Q2N7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AHL4IB52FIAV3CR6256BRLPTZTOMH7FU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wb4gcs (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": "87014499e012476c8198fad186f7f963",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/87014499e012476c8198fad186f7f963/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jim Sanford",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: [Bod] Re:  Re: FCC Omnibus R&O",
    "date": "2006-10-13T04:20:05Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PLH5IF4HMQDCC35RE4EA732J7MB7HWAB/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Guys:\nLike Rick, I think our original announcement was sufficient.\n\nRe-reading it from Paul's perspective, however, and I can see room for \nimprovement.  I'll get a sentence added to the L-band paragraph ASAP.\n73,\nJim\[email protected]\n\n\nRobert McGwier wrote:\n\n> Great news.  Thanks for handling this.  Paul asked me into the hall \n> during the symposium to express his concerns.   His worries turned out \n> to be reasonable.  I received a private note from I8CVS wondering why \n> we would be encouraging Region 1 hams to break the law.  If the extra \n> language mitigates this,  I think that we should modify our public \n> statements to carefully point out our intentions.  May I still suggest \n> that we should attempt to go through the IARU coordination and FCC \n> notification as early as is practicable since we do not wish to build \n> an entire program around a wish and a prayer.  If we were going to do \n> that we would fly L band up only.\n>\n> Bob\n> N4HY\n>\n> Rick Hambly (W2GPS) wrote:\n>\n>> Bob,\n>>\n>> I spoke with Paul Rinaldo today. He is concerned that the wording of our\n>> press release, as shown on the main AMSAT Web page, could be \n>> misinterpreted\n>> to imply that we are encouraging Hams in Region 1 to uplink to Eagle \n>> on 3.4\n>> GHz (S2-band). \n>> While I disagree with him on this point I see no problem with adding a\n>> footnote or comment to every such engineering and news release that \n>> explains\n>> that we are providing the alternative L-band uplink for those Region \n>> 1 users\n>> who do not have Amateur Satellite Service authorization on S2-band.\n>>\n>> Paul agreed that this will alleviate his concerns about FCC and ITU \n>> reaction\n>> to our plans.\n>>\n>> I copied Paul on this e-mail to be sure he has a chance to comment if \n>> I have\n>> misunderstood his comments.\n>>\n>> Rick\n>> W2GPS\n>> AMSAT President\n>>  \n>>   \n>\n>\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}