Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AM6FEE5LWBXRB6MKDJAOZCMU7UPFE65K/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "001301c6d74c$3bcfd380$643aa8c0@notepad8",
    "message_id_hash": "AM6FEE5LWBXRB6MKDJAOZCMU7UPFE65K",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NJSMRGII4D3VWNW3DMVJMTNB3CA3JQQI/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "eagle (a) howardlong.com",
        "mailman_id": "a9c59876bf364a4fb3565b10d9755577",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/a9c59876bf364a4fb3565b10d9755577/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Howard Long",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: Analog transponder revisited",
    "date": "2006-09-13T15:49:38Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3YXJXQHGD6XRWKOKI5DKDWZWKF2D3XQO/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Lyle\n\n> The analog transponder package(s) for Eagle were \n> decided to be based on SDX technology at the meeting \n> in Pittsburgh in Oct 2005.  The overall architecture - \n> including preliminary wiring harness design - was \n> then drawn up at a subsequent meeting in Colorado \n> Springs later that same month.\n\nThanks for your comments.\n\nI am referring to this from Rick, sent on 25 July 2005:\n\n> See the Eagle specification document at \n> http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/eagle/Eagle_Fall_2004.php \n>\n> It says \"To provide a safe backup system in case \n> of a failure in the digital implementation of the \n> linear transponders there will be two S-Band \n> transmitters and either of them will be capable \n> of being driven by the SDR driver or by a \n> traditional analog linear driver. One or more \n> of the receivers will also be capable of analog \n> operation.\"\n\nWhich was in direct response to this question: \n\n> I'd hate to think we are going to hang our\n> entire mission on just the SDR transponders. Wouldn't \n> it be prudent to include at least a bare bones analog \n> backup transponder? Please tell me this is the plan.\n\nIf the situation has changed, then I am not sure that we have properly\ncommunicated it. My concern is that if we don't deal with this then it will\ncome out and bite us in the future. \n\n73, Howard\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}