Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CGOFOWYRRMNOGLYSSXY2USXTLK5SBTWJ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "006c01c6d802$2ff075e0$0b0a0a0a@RICK",
    "message_id_hash": "CGOFOWYRRMNOGLYSSXY2USXTLK5SBTWJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/S6MTDLRRNSZMHKV4ABPGNK3QDFVRZMZU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w2gps (a) cnssys.com",
        "mailman_id": "5948a5f4b4c343b5ae370965ac0fc1c2",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/5948a5f4b4c343b5ae370965ac0fc1c2/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Rick Hambly (W2GPS)",
    "subject": "[eagle]  Eagle Band Plan",
    "date": "2006-09-14T13:32:12Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/S6MTDLRRNSZMHKV4ABPGNK3QDFVRZMZU/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "All,\n\nI would like to reiterate my proposal for the Eagle band plan.\n\na) Keep the U/V SDX transponder as is.\n\nb) Move C-C Rider's primary uplink to the S2-band (3400-3410 MHz). Also\nprovide a backup uplink on L-band (1260-1270 MHz) but with fixed antennas\noptimized for use at apogee.\n\nc) Implement an L/S SDX transponder, essentially identical to the U/S SDX\ntransponder. This transponder would use fixed antennas and so will be usable\nnear apogee. It would serve as a backup command and control access to the\nIHU. By being separate it would reduce the risk of common component\nfailures. This would not use a TSFR module. This restores a promise we made\nto our membership that they have reasonably come to expect from Eagle.\n\nIn a message this morning N4HY said \"I support John's contention that we\nshould choose a band that is currently available world wide for the uplink\non which we can feasibly build a system.  Pick L or S1 is my recommendation.\nWe chose S1 for all of these reasons.\" This is precisely the kind of\npolitical thinking that got us into the mess we are in now.  The technical\ngroup should have stuck with the best technical result they identified in\nSDO for C-C Rider, an S2 uplink to replace the C uplink, and leave the\npolitical ramifications to be evaluated separately. It was clear in the SDO\nmeeting that S2 is the best technical solution. A secondary access through\nL-band should mitigate the short term political fallout and this plan\nprovides incentive to solve the political issues that otherwise will\nlanguish until S2 is gone.\n\nRick\nW2GPS\nAMSAT LM2232\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}