Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DD6P3E2B6GFLUZYXJWXCER7AV34CKJIK/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DD6P3E2B6GFLUZYXJWXCER7AV34CKJIK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kk7p (a) wavecable.com",
        "mailman_id": "ecaeda8313f54fe6b33b16a345e6ba3a",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/ecaeda8313f54fe6b33b16a345e6ba3a/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Lyle Johnson",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: The thorny issue of SDX/Analog linear transpnder",
    "date": "2006-10-03T01:51:03Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GFEXBLZJIN7ZWKRBBN7BTGN3JQ5QCBMU/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello Howard!\n\n> I know that the current documented thinking is to have two SDX's and no\n> analog transponder, however we did say we'd bring up for discussion at a\n> telecon prior to the Symposium. I know that this was brought up in July 2005\n> where it was clear that the answer to the members was yes, we'd have a\n> backup _analog_ linear transponder.\n> \n> As we won't now have an opportunity to discuss this in a telecon, can we\n> have a clear line on this? I can just see that someone's gonna ask me this\n> question at my presentation.\n\nOne configuration we discussed at one time was to put an \"analog IF\" \ninside the SDX.  With the SDX operating with a nominal 10.7 MHz IF, we'd \nsimply switch in a gain section with AGC, or switch it out and switch in \nthe digital processing system.  That way, the SDX device would contain \nboth analog and digital transponder circuitry, under control of the CAN \nbus, and with little added mass or complexity.\n\nThe power-on default mode would be analog so in case of an AO-10-liek \nstate, we'd have the highest probability of something working, even if \nit wouldn't be optimal.\n\n73,\n\nLyle kK7P\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}