Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DZYMAEMLTGGSJ2IIMQ27VHTAMCMFMR2W/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DZYMAEMLTGGSJ2IIMQ27VHTAMCMFMR2W",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/25226SNLR7JQHI43WH4WBEEYEO5PLXTI/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ku4os (a) cfl.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Lee McLamb",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: Receiver Spec vs. ATP,\ta few Suggestions and a Question or Two",
    "date": "2007-08-03T01:58:32Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/25226SNLR7JQHI43WH4WBEEYEO5PLXTI/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6J3B5WMORYAE2XG4IUEHKQWVEDQEC3IS/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Saturday 28 July 2007 00:23:00 Juan Rivera wrote:\n[snip]\n\n> I also take issue with the -60C minimum power-down temperature.  I think\n> this is unrealistic just from a CTE mismatch perspective.  The reliability\n> of anything subjected to that wide a temperature spread is going to suffer.\n> A way must be found to raise that temperature.\n\nAs I understand this the low temp came from the combination of the need to \nheat sink the receiver and the long eclipses.  If, during the redesign, John \ncould find a way to avoid needing the heat sink then the temp swings would be \nmuch less.\n\n73,\nLee-KU4OS\n",
    "attachments": []
}