Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G5WJ5M4VHARJ6LEFQSG4ZWZGUPHXLJ4A/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "G5WJ5M4VHARJ6LEFQSG4ZWZGUPHXLJ4A",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NHX6X5EKQIQSZSS634TXEOLCBVH3Q3HB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "K3IO (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "79a9b3ddaa4b44baae47f92374974ac4",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/79a9b3ddaa4b44baae47f92374974ac4/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tom Clark, K3IO",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: Eagle 10 MHz Clock",
    "date": "2007-04-10T03:52:15Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N2MTLNMXZ7CXS4BERHPB6RBNB63N4B4R/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BKSAJBFHITVQQSNQ52MLHHTVSP5YGOQR/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Bill Ress wrote:\n> 1) What is the reason for requiring all LO's to be locked to a 10 MHz \n> satellite system clock or are they?\n>\n>   \nThat requirement comes from me. It is my fervent hope that we will be\nable to use the transponders for accurate coherent s/c ranging;\ntherefore we want the TX and RX LOs to be related to a common (high\nstability) reference. There are also some (undocumented) desires (that\nmay re$ult in $ome project $upport) to use the microwave transponders\nfor high accuracy, intercontinental time & frequency synchronization.\n> 2) Have the performance specifications for the 10 MHz clock been \n> developed and what are they (in particular phase noise, frequency \n> stability, susceptibility to digital hash, and power level available to \n> each using subsystem - to name a few)?\n>\n>   \nMy desire, if it can be promoted (from unnamed $ource$), to use what is\noften called an Ultra-Stable Oscillator (USO) of the type carried on a\nnumber of interplanetary s/c. I envision us being able to tweak the\nfrequency slightly under ground command (i.e. a D/A converter built into\nthe USO).\n> My apologies for sending to the entire Eagle list but I'm not sure who \n> has the responsibility for the clock.\n>\n>   \nSystem level responsibilities are up for grabs AFAIK. So far, my\ncontribution has been to say \"It would tremendously augment capabilities\nif ...\".\n\nPlease keep asking these questions!    73, Tom\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}