Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GFEXBLZJIN7ZWKRBBN7BTGN3JQ5QCBMU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GFEXBLZJIN7ZWKRBBN7BTGN3JQ5QCBMU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "matt (a) ettus.com",
        "mailman_id": "fcfbe2ace2e140b5be16e4b6f8dcea6b",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fcfbe2ace2e140b5be16e4b6f8dcea6b/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Matt Ettus",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: The thorny issue of SDX/Analog linear transpnder",
    "date": "2006-10-03T04:58:32Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DD6P3E2B6GFLUZYXJWXCER7AV34CKJIK/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JY4URJWQWT46NXCY3BME7HQAFTHOYPN4/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V5G4IJ26EBJYL3WD3WCXAL7LJUT4YWHT/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3MVFGVB42VBOAQJ4DVYEWXGLJHRUHCUH/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n>  \n>\n>>I know that the current documented thinking is to have two SDX's and no\n>>analog transponder, however we did say we'd bring up for discussion at a\n>>telecon prior to the Symposium. I know that this was brought up in July 2005\n>>where it was clear that the answer to the members was yes, we'd have a\n>>backup _analog_ linear transponder.\n>>    \n>>\nWhy stop there?  We should have a backup to the analog transponder in \nthe form of a CW transponder.  Then we can back that up with a spark \ntransponder.  Finally, we should have some sort of semaphores or smoke \nsignals to back that up.\n\nSeriously, if we have 2 SDX's, aren't they backups for each other?\n\nMatt\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}