Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/K6XFGXUIMWC64V4ZURQG25YZHYP2LD2E/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/K6XFGXUIMWC64V4ZURQG25YZHYP2LD2E/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "K6XFGXUIMWC64V4ZURQG25YZHYP2LD2E",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KYYG6EXV4ZEGDMGRGYOUMNSJRBNHLAS2/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "greencl (a) mindspring.com",
        "mailman_id": "5421c5ff9a12494f8f7bd304db4ac696",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/5421c5ff9a12494f8f7bd304db4ac696/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Chuck Green",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: Revised Module Suggestion",
    "date": "2007-10-16T15:37:57Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ENNSDG5ZHKEKXASBINO54QMZOCDS2IXK/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TKYG6WPJFJYQWJ55GNUWR4XPKE2B4UEB/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QND5CQSQ47OUGUPZGA3VN6FZCXWMJ4C3/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Rick,\n\nThat's news to me.  What is this secret group you called \"We\" and when \ndo they intend to include the rest of the Eagle community?  Also, where \nshould I ship the parts that were purchased for the IHU?  The developers \nof this new IHU may be able to use some of them.\n\nChuck\n\nRick Hambly (W2GPS) wrote:\n> Chuck,\n>\n> I think there is a good chance that the IHU will be redesigned for Eagle. We\n> are discussing some important changes like switching to an open core instead\n> of the ARM core, changing the oscillator design, and other improvements. If\n> that is done it will be a modest leap to a new board size.\n>\n> Rick\n> W2GPS\n> AMSAT LM2232\n>  \n>\n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of\n> Chuck Green\n> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:15 AM\n> To: Dick Jansson-rr\n> Cc: 'AMSAT Eagle'\n> Subject: [eagle] Re: Revised Module Suggestion\n>\n> Hi Dick,\n>\n> When considering special needs, don't forget that the IHU has already \n> been designed and will need a box to accommodate it. You did this once, \n> but with the new box designs, it may need to be done again.\n>\n> Chuck\n>\n> Dick Jansson-rr wrote:\n>   \n>> Juan:\n>>\n>> There is another issue that comes to mind regarding \"specialized\" \n>> modules. In a program such as Eagle we will need to create an \n>> acceptable module design that is useful for many applications in the \n>> mission and then turn on the fabrication machinery for producing these \n>> long before the electronic forces are ready to populate them for \n>> flight. On P3D in 1992-3 we gambled and manufactured a very many \n>> module parts, expecting that we would have some spares left over - \n>> wrong! Even with this quite large quantity of parts (and at that time \n>> there was criticism that we were making too many) we ran out before \n>> flight and had to make some more.\n>>\n>> Fabricating module parts for this program is a guessing game, with \n>> some estimates of needing to construct up to 80 sets of parts, and \n>> that may not be enough. You can do the detailed program mathematics \n>> and come up with some number and I will be willing to bet that you end \n>> up on the wrong side of that guess. It's a dicey game.\n>>\n>> The lesson in this is that we must create a generic module design and \n>> hardware that can be adapted for many different assignments in the \n>> spacecraft. Save for your specialized need, we have no indication of \n>> any other specialized module needs. This is why I prefer to adapt a \n>> generic module to your needs with the added heat sinks, rather than \n>> make just a specially machined device just for your needs. And if we \n>> do, we will probably not have enough of them. This is why I prefer to \n>> have a generic module design and then carefully adapt it as required \n>> for specialized module needs. We will be flying more than just the U \n>> receiver!.\n>>\n>> '73,\n>>\n>> Dick Jansson, KD1K\n>>\n>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>\n>>\n>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>\n>>\n>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Juan \n>> Rivera\n>> *Sent:* Monday, 15 October, 2007 15.38\n>> *To:* Dick Jansson-rr\n>> *Cc:* Bob Davis; AMSAT Eagle\n>> *Subject:* Re: [eagle] Revised Module Suggestion\n>>\n>> Dick,\n>>\n>> That looks nice! It appears to solve the issue of getting that front \n>> panel at exactly 90 degrees to the baseplate and also increases the \n>> stiffness of the baseplate. Increasing the useful front panel space \n>> also eases the problem of working around the CAN-Do PCB with all of \n>> the necessary I/O connectors.\n>>\n>> Would it be possible to customize the baseplate for the few modules \n>> that draw high power? It would be nice to machine the baseplate and \n>> heat sinks as one chunk of metal instead of the existing method of \n>> having several individual heat sink pieces. I would like to see the \n>> PCB laying flat on top of the baseplate with milled cutouts to \n>> accommodate any devices attached to the bottom side. In a perfect \n>> world there would be no components on the bottom and the PCB would \n>> make contact with the baseplate across the entire surface. Another \n>> possibility that might be worth considering would be the ability to \n>> include \"U\" shaped heat sinks that would bridge over the top side of \n>> hot components and attach to the baseplate through holes cut into the \n>> PCB on either side of the component. Thermal gap filler could allow \n>> room for CTE mismatches so that the device isn't crushed.\n>>\n>> 73, Juan - WA6HTP\n>>\n>>\n>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA\n>> [email protected]\n>> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle\n>>   \n>>     \n> _______________________________________________\n> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA\n> [email protected]\n> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle\n>\n>\n>\n>   \n",
    "attachments": []
}