Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PLH5IF4HMQDCC35RE4EA732J7MB7HWAB/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "PLH5IF4HMQDCC35RE4EA732J7MB7HWAB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AHL4IB52FIAV3CR6256BRLPTZTOMH7FU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rwmcgwier (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Robert McGwier",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: [Bod] Re:  Re: FCC Omnibus R&O",
    "date": "2006-10-13T04:09:38Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XP43EDEIPJFROF2JOJDHPDO46LOCI2WH/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7J4ZYOJ63ORHJWIMGTZQNFKGX4U5Q2N7/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Great news.  Thanks for handling this.  Paul asked me into the hall \nduring the symposium to express his concerns.   His worries turned out \nto be reasonable.  I received a private note from I8CVS wondering why we \nwould be encouraging Region 1 hams to break the law.  If the extra \nlanguage mitigates this,  I think that we should modify our public \nstatements to carefully point out our intentions.  May I still suggest \nthat we should attempt to go through the IARU coordination and FCC \nnotification as early as is practicable since we do not wish to build an \nentire program around a wish and a prayer.  If we were going to do that \nwe would fly L band up only.\n\nBob\nN4HY\n\nRick Hambly (W2GPS) wrote:\n> Bob,\n>\n> I spoke with Paul Rinaldo today. He is concerned that the wording of our\n> press release, as shown on the main AMSAT Web page, could be misinterpreted\n> to imply that we are encouraging Hams in Region 1 to uplink to Eagle on 3.4\n> GHz (S2-band).  \n>\n> While I disagree with him on this point I see no problem with adding a\n> footnote or comment to every such engineering and news release that explains\n> that we are providing the alternative L-band uplink for those Region 1 users\n> who do not have Amateur Satellite Service authorization on S2-band.\n>\n> Paul agreed that this will alleviate his concerns about FCC and ITU reaction\n> to our plans.\n>\n> I copied Paul on this e-mail to be sure he has a chance to comment if I have\n> misunderstood his comments.\n>\n> Rick\n> W2GPS\n> AMSAT President\n>  \n>   \n\n\n-- \nAMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,\nTAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair\n\"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.\nYou pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los\nAngeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly\nthe same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.\nThe only difference is that there is no cat.\" - Einstein\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}