Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RYO3M5EEJXDFGDNGZROIX2LSJGSJSF5J/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "RYO3M5EEJXDFGDNGZROIX2LSJGSJSF5J",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7ZRJTFY3HTTJCLE3NU54SUJHNLJ5MZKZ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rwmcgwier (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Robert McGwier",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: Eagle L-band receiver",
    "date": "2006-09-23T21:16:25Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/R2TWIIUF6MKG44KTRJ6ZWJ7QOOXZGCMB/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "We can support a single front end and two IF chains inernally especially \nfor L band.  One for a 10.7 MHz QSD/SDX based linear transponder input.  \nThe other for a QSD  10.7+difference IF feeding up to, but not exceeding \n200 kHz bandwidth.  I will be uploading new spread sheets for all the \nrecommended bands/modes soon after Jim makes his announcement.\n\nBob\n  \n\nMiroslav Kasal wrote:\n> It seems to me as difficult. Maybe it will be better to do a new simple \n> IF chain with this bandwidth. The command receiver is designed by \n> similar way.\n>\n> Mirek\n>\n>\n> John B. Stephensen wrote:\n>\n>   \n>> Could the RUDAK output be widened to 1 MHz?\n>>\n>> 73,\n>>\n>> John\n>> KD6OZH\n>>\n>> ----- Original Message ----- From: \"Miroslav Kasal\" <[email protected]>\n>> To: \"John B. Stephensen\" <[email protected]>\n>> Cc: <[email protected]>\n>> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 16:37 UTC\n>> Subject: Re: [eagle] Eagle L-band receiver\n>>\n>>\n>>     \n>>> Hi John,\n>>>\n>>> Thanks for the message. Yes, you are right. The originally planed \n>>> RUDAK output  bandwidth is about 250 kHz  (150 kHz nominal) below the \n>>> analog passband with center 10.7 MHz  and bandwidth 150 kHz. However  \n>>> RUDAK  system  will be not implemented into P3E  and will be changed \n>>> by SDX. We assume to connect SDX to the same output. Only AGC is need \n>>> to modify for both modes.\n>>>\n>>> 73, Mirek OK2AQK\n>>>\n>>>  \n>>> John B. Stephensen wrote:\n>>>\n>>>       \n>>>> Welcome to the group. I see that there are 2 paths through the P3E \n>>>> 23 cm receiver -- one with ceramic filters and one without. What's \n>>>> the bandwidth of the Rudak output?\n>>>>\n>>>> 73,\n>>>>\n>>>> John\n>>>> KD6OZH\n>>>>         \n>>>\n>>>       \n>>     \n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA\n> [email protected]\n> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle\n>\n>   \n\n\n-- \nAMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,\nNJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman\n\"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.\nYou pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los\nAngeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly\nthe same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.\nThe only difference is that there is no cat.\" - Einstein\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}