Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SOBF2PDO2M3YQP25AH63VDZQVRCCZDQC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "SOBF2PDO2M3YQP25AH63VDZQVRCCZDQC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/SOBF2PDO2M3YQP25AH63VDZQVRCCZDQC/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rjansson (a) cfl.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": "9b211bcd8a0642788e6dc055f3930699",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9b211bcd8a0642788e6dc055f3930699/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dick Jansson-rr",
    "subject": "[eagle]  Module Requirements",
    "date": "2007-10-08T23:34:31Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Bob:\n \nHere are my first comments regarding your Eagle Module Requirements\ndocument. These are first brush and I reserve the right to add to them. J  \n \n1)     ¶6.8:  I would suggest restricting the drawing sizes to “A” and “B”,\nas we did for AO-40, as it allows the use of easily available reproduction\nmachinery, both in creation and replication, and in the standardization of\nthe handling of the drawings.\n2)     ¶6.10:  I would suggest that the term “…hardware elements\n(screws)...” be used instead of “...hardware joints…” This more specific\nreference makes clear that requirement.\n3)     ¶7.4:  You speak of “generic”, generic what is your reference?\n4)     ¶7.10:  What is meant here?\n5)     ¶8.5:  To accommodate a maximization of the spaceframe Izz, I found\nthat I had to move the equipment panels outward as far as possible to be\nable to achieve this needed Izz. This step removed a lot of otherwise vacant\nspace above the modules, thus restricting the over height of the modules,\nwhich would probably preclude the stacking of modules. Further, I don’t feel\nthat the AO-40 stacking experience was all that good. On the thermal arena\nand stacking, stacked modules do not radiate their heat very well and such\nstacking would be somewhat thermally restrictive.\n6)     ¶9.9:  Good!\n7)     You have made no provision for the creation of a “heat sink” module\nthat will be necessary for the really high power modules, defined hereby as\ngreater than 5+ Watts for a 125x180 module. Also the inclusion of small heat\nsinks, as done for the recent URx work, does not seem to have a home in your\ndocument.\n \nI hope that these comments will help you and others.\n \n’73,\nDick Jansson, KD1K\n <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] \n <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] \n \n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SOBF2PDO2M3YQP25AH63VDZQVRCCZDQC/?format=api",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "iso-8859-1",
            "size": 29120,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/SOBF2PDO2M3YQP25AH63VDZQVRCCZDQC/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}