Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TNENTI5MVFDJVYQXCFU34CUDYL57XFGU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "TNENTI5MVFDJVYQXCFU34CUDYL57XFGU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "bdale (a) gag.com",
        "mailman_id": "805200a293b9433cb2f9596737eedb92",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/805200a293b9433cb2f9596737eedb92/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bdale Garbee",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: The thorny issue of SDX/Analog linear transpnder",
    "date": "2006-10-04T17:21:57Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TNZ3DPYP3QU6IYYCHYOTXMGDQQBPBF3Y/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/43K2424CYLTPQO4VUI4UX5AWYUIR4HHR/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 12:25 -0400, Louis McFadin wrote:\n> Martin is exactly right. Two of the same things is only partial\n> redundancy. In order to be fully redundant the two systems must be\n> independent, built by different teams and have different technology. \n\nI think we should also remind ourselves that redundancy exists at\ndifferent levels of granularity.  For example, we might build more than\none unit of Eagle, P3E provides redundancy with Eagle and vice versa,\netc.\n\nIt's important that we think through the various possible failure modes\nand \"do the right thing\" to mitigate each, and maximize the probability\nthat we're left with something useful even if various important parts\nfail.  However, if we insist on a mil-aero level of absolute redundancy\nat too fine a level of granularity on a single satellite, we run a real\nrisk of specifying something we can't afford to build or fly.  Our prior\nand future success hinge heavily, I think, on our collective ability to\nbe smart about these sorts of tradeoffs.\n\nHoward, if I were the one giving your talk this weekend I'd be inclined\nto assert that reliability and redundancy are being considered at every\nlevel of the Eagle project, but I wouldn't be inclined to commit us to\nany particular technology path like promising an analog transponder as\nbackup.\n\n73 - Bdale, KB0G\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}