Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TNZ3DPYP3QU6IYYCHYOTXMGDQQBPBF3Y/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "TNZ3DPYP3QU6IYYCHYOTXMGDQQBPBF3Y",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w5did (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": "8da25cae70294f3687f590ebe6fded03",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8da25cae70294f3687f590ebe6fded03/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Louis McFadin",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: The thorny issue of SDX/Analog linear transpnder",
    "date": "2006-10-03T16:25:47Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V5G4IJ26EBJYL3WD3WCXAL7LJUT4YWHT/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GUG65VHZR4U2WFTHGWW2PIUXZUTDCV4M/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/H3COLI54FNQ3FCWU6SHX42HAG6OBA5AK/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TNENTI5MVFDJVYQXCFU34CUDYL57XFGU/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Martin is exactly right. Two of the same things is only partial  \nredundancy. In order to be fully redundant the two systems must be  \nindependent, built by different teams and have different technology.  \nWe can't afford to stumble on this.\nIt seems to me that Mirek has already solved this problem for us.\n\n\nLou McFadin\nW5DID\[email protected]\n\n\nOn Oct 3, 2006, at 4:24 AM, Howard Long wrote:\n\n> Hi Matt\n>\n>> Why stop there?  We should have a backup to the\n>> analog transponder in the form of a CW transponder.\n>> Then we can back that up with a spark transponder.\n>> Finally, we should have some sort of semaphores or\n>> smoke signals to back that up.\n>\n> The point is that the commitment to have an analog backup had  \n> already been\n> made. You may not have been party to the discussions around July  \n> 2005, but\n> believe me they were just as vociferous as the recent disinformation\n> floating about regarding S1. It is important to consider seriously  \n> what the\n> members want - after all, they are paying for it, and there would  \n> be no\n> AMSAT-NA or Eagle without them.\n>\n>> Seriously, if we have 2 SDX's, aren't they backups\n>> for each other?\n>\n> Well, this raises an interesting point. My understanding from  \n> discussions\n> over this side of the pond with Martin Sweeting is that redundancy  \n> only\n> truly exists if you also have two different designs: having two  \n> devices of\n> the same design does not resolve design flaws. In SSTL's case,  \n> Martin's view\n> is that the majority of failures are now down to design, with a  \n> minority\n> environmental (radiation, thermal, outgassing etc etc).\n>\n> 73, Howard G6LVB\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Via the Eagle mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA\n> [email protected]\n> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/eagle\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TNZ3DPYP3QU6IYYCHYOTXMGDQQBPBF3Y/?format=api",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "iso-8859-1",
            "size": 6261,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/TNZ3DPYP3QU6IYYCHYOTXMGDQQBPBF3Y/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}