Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/USGW5L4ZKUFQPRAIUC576UF5XIR4R5DS/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "USGW5L4ZKUFQPRAIUC576UF5XIR4R5DS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/OTYTGCXZIN2XPHIPEAYAFQ632QSDABAZ/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rwmcgwier (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Robert McGwier",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: Team Speak tomorrow night",
    "date": "2006-09-12T18:25:58Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JYBFHUHXVN6MEDJAGJMSNACNJDRYEGYO/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Dick Jansson-rr wrote:\n> In my mind this is the REAL issue - will there be room for the L and S\n> antennas for this operation. And I have NO idea as to the answer to that\n> as we have not designed the antenna array yet, much less the whole\n> spaceframe. If there is antenna and module space then some things like\n> this could be flown. I otherwise refuse to get caught up in the emotions\n> of the issue.\n>   \n\nGood for you.   Given the latest drawing of the antenna concept  if we \nchanged the S1 for an S2 array,  we MIGHT be able to put an L/S1 antenna \non the +Z but it would be the old P3 type,  boresight, no steering.  \nAgain,  I am NOT proposing a change or an addition.  I oppose any change \nwithout cause from the decisions we made in SAN.  I am asking a \nquestion.  What do we do if S1 is under serious threat?  Two days ago,  \nI believed it might be.  In addition, there will be a million questions \nasked at the symposium.  Today,  I am not so sure and Paul Rinaldo has \nnot even a whiff of a problem.  I have asked him to study it in detail \nwhile he is in Geneva at the ITU (timing is everything is it not?).\n\n\n\nBob\n\n> Dick Jansson\n>   \n\n\n-- \nAMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,\nNJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman\n\"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.\nYou pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los\nAngeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly\nthe same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.\nThe only difference is that there is no cat.\" - Einstein\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}