Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V5G4IJ26EBJYL3WD3WCXAL7LJUT4YWHT/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "006201c6e6c5$5e899ae0$643aa8c0@notepad8",
    "message_id_hash": "V5G4IJ26EBJYL3WD3WCXAL7LJUT4YWHT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2A6XCU6JZG7FGIGHDULSE2IPEF4676Q4/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "howard (a) howardlong.com",
        "mailman_id": "82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Howard Long",
    "subject": "[eagle] Re: The thorny issue of SDX/Analog linear transpnder",
    "date": "2006-10-03T08:24:38Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GFEXBLZJIN7ZWKRBBN7BTGN3JQ5QCBMU/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HNEYXV3HTTTQ7VLBWQJ372DXA6HMQOWR/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TNZ3DPYP3QU6IYYCHYOTXMGDQQBPBF3Y/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Matt\n\n> Why stop there?  We should have a backup to the \n> analog transponder in the form of a CW transponder. \n> Then we can back that up with a spark transponder.  \n> Finally, we should have some sort of semaphores or \n> smoke signals to back that up.\n\nThe point is that the commitment to have an analog backup had already been\nmade. You may not have been party to the discussions around July 2005, but\nbelieve me they were just as vociferous as the recent disinformation\nfloating about regarding S1. It is important to consider seriously what the\nmembers want - after all, they are paying for it, and there would be no\nAMSAT-NA or Eagle without them.\n\n> Seriously, if we have 2 SDX's, aren't they backups \n> for each other?\n\nWell, this raises an interesting point. My understanding from discussions\nover this side of the pond with Martin Sweeting is that redundancy only\ntruly exists if you also have two different designs: having two devices of\nthe same design does not resolve design flaws. In SSTL's case, Martin's view\nis that the majority of failures are now down to design, with a minority\nenvironmental (radiation, thermal, outgassing etc etc).\n\n73, Howard G6LVB\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}