Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZVFXM3KRXQE5EI6UJUX3ZHE4UMJP7ZKB/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ZVFXM3KRXQE5EI6UJUX3ZHE4UMJP7ZKB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZVFXM3KRXQE5EI6UJUX3ZHE4UMJP7ZKB/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "RaySoifer (a) cs.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[eagle]  3.4 GHz",
    "date": "2006-10-14T00:42:21Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi all,\n\nFurther to my earlier e-mail about the Omnibus R&O, my recommendation for now \nis that AMSAT proceed with the IARU coordination process for the proposed \nEagle frequency plan, but that any out-of-the-ordinary action with FCC is \nunwarranted.\n\nThe proposed orbital debris language is not now in effect, for the reasons \ndiscussed in my earlier e-mail.  It is AMSAT's position, as stated in our recon \npetition, that FCC does not have the authority to adopt or enforce it.\n\nThe ITU notification process provided for in the R&O is just that, \nnotification, and is not in any sense a scheme for licensing space stations in advance.  \nFCC's position on that is very clear, and stated in Sec. 97.207: any amateur \nstation may be a space station.  Full stop.  We may not like that for whatever \nreason, but as the shady mutual-fund operator Bernie Cornfeld once said about \nthe SEC, \"they may be schmucks but they're the government.\"\n\nThe way things will work in practice is that when we file our notification \nwith FCC, they will in due course inform the ITU Radiocommunication Bureau.  The \nBureau will, in turn, inform member states, any of which may object.  If they \ndo, it is up to them and FCC to work it out.  In such a case, our response \nwould be very simple: \"Our uplink causes no interference, harmful or otherwise.  \nIf you don't like it, just tell your country's amateur licensees not to use \nit.\"\n\nIn the meantime, the fewer waves made, the better.\n\nMy 3 cents worth (before tax, that is).\n\n73,  \n\nRay   \n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZVFXM3KRXQE5EI6UJUX3ZHE4UMJP7ZKB/",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "us-ascii",
            "size": 1751,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/ZVFXM3KRXQE5EI6UJUX3ZHE4UMJP7ZKB/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}