Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7HC766EABH42TH25DI3PNUPWNP7BLMD4/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "7HC766EABH42TH25DI3PNUPWNP7BLMD4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7HC766EABH42TH25DI3PNUPWNP7BLMD4/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "jbrandenburg (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": "fba29bb05aa944e3b759fb437017d01e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fba29bb05aa944e3b759fb437017d01e/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jonathan Brandenburg",
    "subject": "[pacsat-dev] Re: PC-104 \"Standard\"",
    "date": "2023-04-07T15:07:36Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 4/7/2023 9:45 AM, Burns Fisher (AMSAT) via pacsat-dev wrote:\n> I'd be interested if those who use PC104 actually use them throughout \n> the satellite (i.e. they use them like Fox/Golf uses the QxN \n> connectors where most of the signals pass through).  Also what board \n> spacing where these connectors are used if there is anything typical. \n>  (I think Eric said there were choices for the PC-104 connectors).\n\nI'll include these questions in my survey... it would be interesting to \nknow the prevalence of ribbon cables for sure.\n\nJonathan\n\n-- \nJonathan Brandenburg, KF5IDY\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}