Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Z5U7K4KCNGJXFMA6QWWQ6J45LG3LBBMW/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CANsNeaoMsTtohWPZbb-3XHfHCHG92WOxKT2ZzOe7HyozWpxGbA@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "Z5U7K4KCNGJXFMA6QWWQ6J45LG3LBBMW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Z5U7K4KCNGJXFMA6QWWQ6J45LG3LBBMW/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rich (a) ourowndomain.com",
        "mailman_id": "de4e965f89da4d4790638af3cb47f33c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/de4e965f89da4d4790638af3cb47f33c/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Rich Gopstein",
    "subject": "[pacsat-dev] Fwd: ax5043 RSSI calibration",
    "date": "2023-04-28T19:54:39Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "FYI...\n\n---------- Forwarded message ---------\nFrom: Rich Gopstein <[email protected]>\nDate: Sun, Feb 28, 2021, 5:04 PM\nSubject: Re: ax5043 RSSI calibration\nTo: Burns Fisher (AMSAT) <[email protected]>, Zach Metzinger <\[email protected]>, Eric Skoog <[email protected]>\n\n\nAnd I just double checked the secondary ax5043 again - and it varied in the\n-97 to -90 range with a dummy load, but didn't go any lower than that.\n\nNote that on my board, I don't have mmcx connectors, only coax soldered to\nthe board with SMA connectors on the other end, so maybe that's the problem?\n\nRich\n\n\nOn Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:51 PM Rich Gopstein <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Sorry - you're right - I just checked my notes again, and one of my two\n> ax5043's did go down to -115 with a dummy load.  The other only went down\n> to -90 or so.\n>\n> Rich\n>\n>\n> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:50 PM Burns Fisher (AMSAT) <[email protected]>\n> wrote:\n>\n>> Hmm.  Odd.  With no signal being sent at all, I'm at -114 or so.  Do you\n>> get that kind of value with no signal in the air?\n>>\n>> Good to know it is pretty good though.  And on the other end, we are\n>> unlikely to get a signal as strong as -27!\n>>\n>> Thanks for checking!\n>>\n>> 73,\n>>\n>> Burns Fisher, WB1FJ\n>> *AMSAT(R) Flight Software*\n>>\n>>\n>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:44 PM Rich Gopstein <[email protected]>\n>> wrote:\n>>\n>>> Using the new \"get rssi\" command, I checked the calibration of the RSSI\n>>> when driven with my HP signal generator tuned to the input frequency.\n>>>\n>>> The reported values closely (within 2-3 dBm) matched the generated power\n>>> between -90 dBm and -30 dBm.  -27 dBm was the largest RSSI value reported\n>>> by the ax5043 even with increasing input power.\n>>>\n>>> One of the two ax5043s was able to go down to -97 dBm, the other one\n>>> only went down to -90 dBm (more or less).\n>>>\n>>> Rich\n>>>\n>>>\n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Z5U7K4KCNGJXFMA6QWWQ6J45LG3LBBMW/",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "utf-8",
            "size": 4287,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/Z5U7K4KCNGJXFMA6QWWQ6J45LG3LBBMW/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}