Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JGIEEOPB6JVHXJ4ETQ3YCDCFADJWF7BG/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CANsNeaoTw0yRPrjd-+M72Cd0aGoWudDzn9htxFHS6pP0kXoh1A@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "JGIEEOPB6JVHXJ4ETQ3YCDCFADJWF7BG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JGIEEOPB6JVHXJ4ETQ3YCDCFADJWF7BG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rich (a) ourowndomain.com",
        "mailman_id": "de4e965f89da4d4790638af3cb47f33c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/de4e965f89da4d4790638af3cb47f33c/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Rich Gopstein",
    "subject": "[pacsat] Re: [GOLF-TEE] Re: Fwd: BPSK on ax5043 Service Request #242527",
    "date": "2022-10-06T16:20:12Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7ALB3NYL7KZ2RWYUY4GNID4Z6FMAMGBP/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "A big concern regarding the ax5043 is that it requires the use of a\nproprietary Windows application to configure.  If Onsemi stops maintaining\nthat configuration program, we're screwed (unless we stick with\nconfigurations we've already generated).\n\nRich\n\n\nOn Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:22 AM Zach Metzinger <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> On 10/6/22 08:46, Eric Skoog wrote:\n> > BTW Rich - I saw in the chat room the comment you made about the AX5243\n> > ONSEMI chip also being EOL.  That's an interesting chip as\n> > well...........did you note that Digikey has over 38,000 of those in\n> > stock? I wonder how compatible your AX5043 code would be with those\n> chips?\n>\n> The AX5243 and AX5043 are essentially identical, but the former does not\n> have the single-ended output (in addition to the normal differential\n> output). We use both outputs on the RT-IHU right now (SE is 70cm down,\n> Diff is 2m up). Going with the '5243 means we'd have to rethink the\n> Cmd/Tlm paradigm between processors -- and, if one '5243 failed, we'd\n> lose either TX or RX with no backup.\n>\n> --- Zach\n> N0ZGO\n>\n> -----------------------------------------------\n> Golft mailing list -- [email protected]\n> View archives of this mailing list at\n> https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]\n> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]\n> Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at\n> https://mailman.amsat.org\n>\n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JGIEEOPB6JVHXJ4ETQ3YCDCFADJWF7BG/?format=api",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "utf-8",
            "size": 2125,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/JGIEEOPB6JVHXJ4ETQ3YCDCFADJWF7BG/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}