25 Feb
2017
25 Feb
'17
9:41 p.m.
Paul,
Thanks for the clarification. Not meaning to hijack the thread, but I'm a bit surprised about that. I would have thought that the need for verification would be a given. I guess it would have been impractical in the days when verification was only via QSL cards. With systems like LOTW and qrz.com, perhaps not as impractical. Well, who am I to argue?
73,
Mac / AE5PH
On 02/25/2017 09:46 PM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
The W4AMI Award does not require confirmations. I log 100%, but some only log new calls.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 22:40 Mac A. Cody <maccody@att.net mailto:maccody@att.net> wrote:
I'd say that it also doesn't help that hams that do use LOTW don't always log their QSOs. I've been using LOTW for eight monthsnow. I have about 425 QSOs, of which 297 have bee QSL'd through LOTW. Over half of those that have not been QSL'd (over sixty) are with LOTW users. Most are single QSOs, but a number are hams that I have QSO'd with multiple times. Perhaps it may not be important to log those QSOs that have occurred with the same ham multiple times. For a ham working towards the Barbee (W4AMI) Satellite Operator Achievement Award, every QSO is important. At what point does one become a nag after politely asking others to QSL past QSOs via LOTW? I dislike being a nag! I've also found that it is sometimes difficult to contact hams to request QSL via LOTW. LOTW does not provide a mechanism, so I've had to resort to searches via qrz.com <http://qrz.com> in the hope of finding a valid email address. It is probably asking too much for LOTW to provided a mechanism to politely 'ping' users to log their QSOs. 73, Mac / AE5PH On 02/25/2017 06:51 PM, Bob wrote: > The REAL issue is that many people don't confirm via LotW. I sort of > figure I owe it to the other guy, so I take the time to make sure my > entries are correct. > > 73, Bob, WB4SON > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net <mailto:w0jab@big-river.net>> wrote: > >> I never was able to get it to work years ago. >> Just gave up and moved on. >> >> John >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org>. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions >> expressed >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of >> AMSAT-NA. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >> > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org>. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org>. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb