I don't think that it is appropriate language or a civil response. The author should be moderated.
Roger WA1KAT
On 12/3/2011 2:26 PM, andy thomas wrote:
I don't think this is the spirit of informed and reasonable debate.
73 de andy g0sfj
----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Kevin Deanesummit496@live.com To: andythomasmail@yahoo.co.uk Sent: Saturday, 3 December 2011, 19:15 Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Stop flaming please
shut the fuck up dumbass, there will be nobody there on FM
Kevin KF7MYK
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:35:10 +0000 From: andythomasmail@yahoo.co.uk To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Stop flaming please
I don't see why someone can't make a suggestion about a qrp experiment without being flamed about being incompetent, inadequate, financially poor or in some other way a lesser member of the -bb. You guys ought to learn a little more tolerance.
Fact #1 is, ao-51 is dead and we don't have anything else of that quality for all of those operators who like doing field operations with an arrow. SO-50 is at best unpredictable and AO27 is not always on, depends on its ssp. Fact #2 is that anyone who is an alligator could have taken over vo-52 and didn't, thankfully. Fact #3 is that nobody would without seeking permission.
So please cut back from the snide clever-clever remarks about having too small a piece of kit, hi. I don't feel bad about raising the idea.
73 de andy g0sfj _______________________________________________