As a dedicated (but frustrated!) long time user of HRD Satellite stuff with my TS2000 my own experience is that the new version 5 is still a problem. However it would appear that the experience varies across hardware platform.
I know Simon has taken note of this from my posting on his forum.
I find the tracking, even when reduced to its most basic form, consumes huge amounts of cpu time. I have also noticed that when connected to the radio (via HRD) Doppler updating (and other radio functions) fails during periods of fast change, i.e. when the sat passing overhead. Whilst HRD maintains its functionality to the radio and to the tracking module it can be a pig to get the tracking module to take back control.
David G8OQW
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Simon (HB9DRV) Sent: 06 August 2009 15:49 To: n3tl@bellsouth.net; Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF Cc: RSwart1@twcny.rr.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HRD software question
Hi,
One thing I'm doing at the moment is reducing the load from HRD, especially with satellite tracking.
The redrawing of the screen is not as efficient as it should be, I'll sort this out soon, I've also seen very high CPU load.
I also have a netbook for testing - all this hardware I have to buy costs a lot but I hope it'll be worth it in the end.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com ----- Original Message ----- From: n3tl@bellsouth.net
I have been using V 4.1 Beta for a few months, and my sense is that all of the multitasking HRD requires is taxing the processor on my Acer Aspire One netbook beyond its capacity. I may be wrong about that, but I suspect that's what's going on. _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb