Yes, but wet 9913 has a loss of ?
While searching for some hardline to replace my 9913 run some years ago, I resorted to drilling a hole in the bottom end of the cable, and sucking out the water periodically with a syringe. It was not an insignificant amount, and made a huge difference. Eventually found someone with some leftover LDF4-50A hardline, and made a swap with him for a UHF beam antenna I had extra. Best deal on the planet.
If you can truly keep your 9913 dry inside, by all means, go for it. But how do you know it's still dry? To me, it's not worth the trouble. If you like that size cable, I'd go with LMR-400 instead of either variety of 9913.
Greg KO6TH
Glenn Miller - AA5PK wrote:
9913F7 has nearly 10 dB attenuation/100 feet at 400 MHz. 9913 has about 2.6 dB.
https://edesk.belden.com/products/techdata/metric/pdf/9913F7.pdf https://catalog.belden.com/techdata/EN/9913_techdata.pdf
I know which I'd choose.
-----Original Message----- From: Norm n3ykf Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 1:09 PM To: Greg D Cc: <, amsat-bb@amsat.org>, ; anderson58625 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Exciting Coax 9913 is not 9913F7
Google is your friend, or perhaps if one is lazy, not.
Norm n3ykf
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb