![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f654725d472c01799eb3bdb08f82a574.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Gopal,
A good decision that you made. A study by Kent, WA5VJB, shows that only some sensitivity of position between elements on the antenna boom impacts using a metal crossboom if the antenna is mounted in the "X" confinguration. My satellite antennas are mounted this way.
73 Ed - KL7UW
At 05:50 PM 4/5/2008, Gopal Madhavan wrote:
I have experimented with both non-metallic and metallic cross booms after reading numerous articles on the subject some years ago. With CP antennae mounted in X configuration there seems to be hardly any difference in performance. I speak of experiments done when AO-40 was active.
I now use a metallic boom as it gives very good rigidity to mount two CP antennae, a small dish for 2.4 GHz, preamps etc. Here in India I do not have the option to order a good section of fibre glass cross boom any way, and so had made do with PVC tube wrapped in fibre glass, but it eventually sagged and I had to periodically rotate it 180 degrees to keep it somewhat level.
Gopal VU2GMN
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb