Hi Herich, DK1TB
When manually tracking a LEO satellite beginning from OSCAR-6 I realized the same trick to point the antennas with an angle 5 to 10 degree in front of the satellite position.
The same technique is used by hunters to shoot down birds.
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message ----- From: "Erich Eichmann" erich.eichmann@t-online.de To: "Mark L. Hammond" marklhammond@gmail.com Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:50 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PC clock
Hello Mark, Domenico and others, when SatPC32 updates the antenna positions it turns the antennas a half
step
in front of the satellites position. The manual says:
"Under all tracking options, the rotors are activated with a precession of one half step, either one half of the time interval or one half of the tracking angle, to ensure that the satellite moves through the antenna focus."
73s, Erich, DK1TB
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark L. Hammond" marklhammond@gmail.com To: "i8cvs" domenico.i8cvs@tin.it Cc: "AMSAT-BB" amsat-bb@amsat.org; W7IN@montana.com Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:25 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PC clock
Hello Domenico,
The very excellent SatPC32 program "leads" so as to keep an accurate pointing at a satellite. It has several adjustments for how often the rotors are updated, gain consideration of the antennas in use, etc.
73,
Mark N8MH
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM, i8cvs domenico.i8cvs@tin.it wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg D." ko6th_greg@hotmail.com To: w7in@montana.com Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 7:47 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PC clock
Hi Larry,
Ok, I understand the need for an accurate clock, though I believe
you're
expectations for being able to track an overhead pass is pushing the limits of orbital prediction pretty hard. Another ham I know locally tried this, and ultimately gave up. His issue was not one of clock accuracy, but of Keps and the mathematics behind them.
Greg KO6TH
Hi Greg, KO6TH
When the software calculate the Az and the El of the satellite at the right time with an accurate clock then it send a command to the rotators but
the
antennas takes a certain time to go in that calculated position and when the antennas are finally there then the satellite is already in another position far advanced in it's orbital path particularly when the satellite pass
is
overhead.
I dont think you want to run the motors every 5 or 10 seconds othervise your control relays will work as a machine-gun
So the issue is not on clock accuracy or Keps or mathematics behind them but it is on the tracking system that we normally use to mimichaise the satellite position with a phase difference between the satellite calculated position and the actual antenna position when the traching command is
sent
to the motors.
If you go over the roof and you follow the ISS by naked eye you will realize that your antenna pointing is always a little bit behind the ISS
position
in the sky and so a very accurate clock to track a LEO satellite is meaning less particularly using high gain antennas with a narrow main lobe.
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
-- Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb