Hi Scott, NX7U
I agree with you about both bandpass filtering on the 70 cm side and lowpass filtering on the 2 meter side.
1. I use bandpass filtering on the 70 cm side with a K3PGP passband filter between the antenna and preamplifier input.
http://www.k3pgp.org/432filter.htm
The above filter has an insertion loss of only 0.062 dB at 435 MHz and provides the bonus of adeguate selectivity to -3dB points at 412 and 466 MHz including a very interesting and original preamplifier protection with easy mechanical fabrication.
2. I use lowpass filtering on the 2 meter side with "A High Power 2-meter Filter" by Mike W. Cook AF9Y described in Proceeding of the 1990 Central States VHF Conference.
Unfortunately I was unable to find a description on internet but if someone is interested on it I can scan a send a copy of the article.
The above home brewed lowpass filter has insertion loss of only -0.065 dB at 146 MHz with a return loss of -40 dB
The harmonic attenuation above 146 MHz as measured with my spectrum analyser HP 8555A and tracking generator HP8444A is the following:
2° hamonic 292 MHz -20 dB 3° " 438 MHz - 45 dB 4° " 584 MHz - 55 dB 5° " 730 MHz - 60 dB
An additional advantage of a lowpass filter against a cavity bandpass filter is that a lowpass filter don't need to be retuned moving between 144 to 146 MHz
I use an antenna mounted 70 cm preamplifier with NF=0.45 dB and G=20 dB followed by a postamplifier with NF= 1.35 dB and G= 15 dB
The 2 meter and 70 cm antennas separation is 2.3 meters and using the above filtering no desensitization occurs even testing with 300 watt RF reaching the 2 meter antenna.
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Townley" nx7u@arrl.net To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:09 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm preamp
There are two potential issues with Mode J:
- The 2m TX overloading the preamp on 70cm. This problem can only be
addressed by reducing the amount of TX energy input to the preamp. That
means
a. bandpass/highpass filtering on the 70cm side b. increased separation of antennas c. reduction in TX power
A 70cm cavity bandpass filter is pretty easy to rig up. I have step-by-step pictures at http://members.cox.net/nx7u/mobile/4x3x5.htm Now the SP7000 has bandpass filtering in it, but I don't know if it's before or after the preamp. If it's not before the preamp, then it won't help the Mode J problem.
- The 2m TX is transmitting a significant 3rd harmonic (145x3=435, a most
unfortunate combination). Similarly, that means a. bandpass/lowpass filtering on the 2m side b. increased separation of antennas c. reduction in TX power
Even if the 3rd harmonic is -60dBc, with a 100W (+50dBm) TX that's still -10dBm radiated--a big signal.
The most prudent (to me) solution is filtering on both ends. When I ran Mode J mobile--where the antennas had no directivity and necessarily were very close together--using the 70cm cavity filter on RX and an ICE 2m BPF filter on TX allowed for no-worries LEO operation. Plus you have the benefits of good amateur practice (filtering TX), and a more intermod-resistant receive path on 70cm. Nearby 460MHz paging/two-way radio systems can really wreck your RX.
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Bill Bruno Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 7:04 PM To: Amsat BB Subject: [amsat-bb] 70cm preamp
On my V/U setup I have a SP7000 70cm preamp. Working FO29(JAS2) my 2
meter
signal overloads the preamp, my signal splattering like an adjacent
strong
station. With preamp off the problem is not there. In testing I found the overload happens in any combination of 70cm 2m frequency pairs. I can eliminate the problem by lowering the tx power, but by doing so I have a hard time copying my own signal. How can I eliminate the 2m sig
overloading
the preamp while still maintaining adequate power? Antennas m2 436cp30, Gulf Alpha 2m5el, both right hand polarization. I could use some suggestions. Thanks Bill
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb