You know how the phone company used to keep paper-insulate thousand (or whatever) conductor, lead sheath cables dry inside? Dry nitrogen pumped in from the central office, and extra bottles soldered in when leaks were found :-)
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Bob- W7LRD w7lrd@comcast.net wrote:
Some years ago I had some 9913, well sealed (so I thought). Gradually the swr crept up. Without a thought, it got trashed and was replaced with LMR 400. Yes the idea of syringing water out of 9913 can work, also a constant blower blowing into the 9913 can work, we can also insert small sponges into the 9913 and replace them when necessary, or we can have the 9913 running down hill the whole way so the water can drip out (makes for a wet ham shack), or we can build a roof over the 9913 to keep it out of the moisture. I could go on and on and I am sure many of you have even more creative ideas! Am I being facetious? Of course I am! Hams can be "cheap" bunch but there is place where a few extra bucks is money well spent. Anything above 70cm I use LMR600. Just having fun today!
73 Bob W7LRD
On January 23, 2018 at 1:03 PM Greg D wrote:
Yes, but wet 9913 has a loss of ? While searching for some hardline to replace my 9913 run some years
ago,
I resorted to drilling a hole in the bottom end of the cable, and sucking out the water periodically with a syringe. It was not an insignificant amount, and made a huge difference. Eventually found someone with some leftover LDF4-50A hardline, and made a swap with
him
for a UHF beam antenna I had extra. Best deal on the planet. If you can truly keep your 9913 dry inside, by all means, go for it. But how do you know it's still dry? To me, it's not worth the
trouble.
If you like that size cable, I'd go with LMR-400 instead of either variety of 9913. Greg KO6TH Glenn Miller - AA5PK wrote: > > 9913F7 has nearly 10 dB attenuation/100 feet at 400 MHz.
9913 has
about 2.6 dB. https://edesk.belden.com/products/techdata/metric/pdf/
9913F7.pdf
https://catalog.belden.com/techdata/EN/9913_techdata.pdf I know which I'd choose. -----Original Message----- From: Norm n3ykf Sent: Tuesday,
January 23,
2018 1:09 PM To: Greg D Cc: <, amsat-bb@amsat.org mailto:
amsat-bb@amsat.org >, ;
anderson58625 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Exciting Coax 9913 is not 9913F7 Google is your friend, or perhaps if one is lazy, not. Norm n3ykf Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/
listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org .
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
membership.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
official views
of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
satellite
program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/
listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org mailto:AMSAT-BB@amsat.org . AMSAT-NA
makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/
listinfo/amsat-bb
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb