10 Dec
2008
10 Dec
'08
3:44 p.m.
I would expect ...
I may be misunderstanding your statement ...
I'm easily mis-understood. Like in my 'just-sent' reply - I said...
The fact that you saw energy on that frequency, with doppler could fairly well rule out a ground-based signal on the 145 MHz uplink, reckon ?
Too few words failed to express what I thought I was thinking. I'll try again.
The fact that you saw energy on that 435.xx, with doppler could fairly well rule out a ground-based signal on 435.xx as the source of interference to the AO-51 uplink. I think that is what you were confirming.
Maybe thats better. Maybe additional coffee may be required .. /;^)
--
<- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->
<- http://www.somenet.net * http://wb5rmg.somenet.net ->
<- http://www.linkedin.com/in/alansieg * My 'Day Job' ->