I have been very interested in the response to "were are the operators". I guess everyone has there definition of fun. I guess my thinking is "if you don't have a car ride the mule". I did not operate AO-7 when it was the latest and greatest but I would think there had to be many who considered it wonderful. I suppose if bigger and better had not come along it still would be so. I too was spoiled by the HEO operations on AO-10,13,40. Fact is they are gone. I guess if the wait until position was applied there would be no one on HF during the low sunspot cycle either. Oh well, anyone interested in a short QSO to keep the whiskers out of there Sat rig meet me and Joe on AO-7.
73's << John
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Auke de Jong sparkycivic@shaw.ca wrote:
I can only offer my own reason for being absent from VO-52 and AO-7: I find keeping-up with the doppler-tuning of these LEO-orbits to be frustrating. It doesn't help that my rig is awkward in this mode, and my PC-control option has a problem I've yet to solve. Add, to this, my manual rotator-controller, and it adds-up to several uncompleted contacts. VO-52 is, of course, harder than ao-7 because of it's height/speed.
Considering just this reason by itself, HEO is much more inviting, because the doppler-effect is so greatly reduced. I think this reason might be shared by several other HAM's on the BB, even if they don't mention it. I even feel a little embarassed to admit that I haven't been able to cope with the different rates of doppler-shift for uplink and downlink. I might have to put my old transciever (FT-726R) back on the air, just because it was a lot easier to control both VFO's mid-QSO to keep centered. I don't even think I've completed one, since I've gotten my relatively modern "satellite rig" FT-847, despite several attempts to do-so.
I think that the FM birds are more populated due to their twofold advantage... very few tuning-steps to stay locked on RX and in some cases, no uplink tuning at all; and FM gear is smaller and cheaper than anything available to work linear, especially portable/mobile.
This would make an excellent poll, if we were on a messageboard-forum such as the one on www.narc.net, or maybe as a mail-back card sent to all members.
I've been skipping/deleting all the other chatter regarding complaints for lack of a functioning HEO, etc etc. I feel so much better for not having been infected by the negativity of others. I hope the storm dies-sown soon so that we can get back to what we do best... whatever it is! 73's Auke
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Price" n4qwf1@gmail.com To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 2:16 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] where all the users
I have been reading about the need for HEO satellites and the reasons we don't have them. I wonder why the folks that wont the HEO's so bad never show up on AO-07 or VO-52. Most passes it is joe K3SZH and maybe two others at most on AO-07 and I hardly ever hear anyone on VO-52. The birds that have all the users are the FM sats. I would love to see a HEO built but if we are not going to use what we have what is the point.
73's << John
-- N4QWF Amateur Radio Operator AO-7,AO-27,SO-50,AO-51,VO-52,ISS Internet N4QWF@AMSAT.ORG Echolink nodes #110903 -L #388463 Formerly KC4AHW VK3FEZ Amsat Member #27845 DXCC #33,478 VUCC SAT #135 WAS SAT #296 51 on AO-51 #13 LON -79.256 LAT 37.459 Grid FM07il
From the Foothills of the Blueridge
*Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming - "WOW, What a ride!" _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.134 / Virus Database: 270.5.0/1558 - Release Date: 7/17/2008 9:56 AM
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb