Where in the world are you getting TLE sets that don’t have a checksum? Boo!
It would be a one-line change to make NASAWASH always ignore the checksum on input (it always regenerates the checksum on output). With a little more effort this could be controlled by a command-line switch.
I can probably generate a quick hack executable for you if needed. Let me know what platform. Or if you’re set up to compile C programs you shouldn’t have any trouble modifying NASAWASH.
-Paul
On Dec 21, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Jim White [email protected] wrote:
Thanks Paul. I had forgotten about nasawash. But it did not help with these sets because it requires a valid checksum and these have no checksum byte at all. Of course adding an arbitrary byte for the checksum does not help.
How about one that reads in tle's without regard to checksums and creates AMSAT format. Then creates TLEs from the AMSAT format. Perhaps that would clean them up. . .
Or something that reads a TLE and creates a valid checksum'd output. . .
Jim
On 12/20/2013 5:25 PM, Paul Williamson wrote:
There’s still NASAWASH, which will do some of that.
http://mustbeart.com/software/nasawash.html
The program could do more to fix spacing problems, but some of what you want is impossible or very difficult. The NASA format is pretty compact and doesn’t have a lot of redundancy that would make it easy for a program to figure out what was meant by some corrupted version.
-Paul
On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jim White [email protected] wrote:
Does anyone know of a program that will 'repair' tle's so they have the right format, spacings, checksums, etc. to assure they will read into various tracking programs?
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb