Great news...
________________________________ From: Jack Wilson wilsonjr71@yahoo.com To: "amsat-bb@amsat.org" amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 6:19 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] WA5KBH
Report from EL29 MD Anderson Hospital
WA5KBH George made it thru surgery. He is short the left kidney, adrenal glands and a lymphoid cluster. He is awake and doing well.
Story is the Doctors and Nurses had to knock him out to get his Arrow and HT out of the OR.
73,
Jack KF5LOQ
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 23, 2012, at 2:00 PM, amsat-bb-request@amsat.org wrote:
Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to amsat-bb@amsat.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to amsat-bb-request@amsat.org
You can reach the person managing the list at amsat-bb-owner@amsat.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (WILLIAMS MICHAEL) 2. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (Ted) 3. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (Alan P. Biddle) 4. Re: AC0RA/m (Wyatt Dirks) 5. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (Floyd Rodgers) 6. First Call for Papers for 2012 Symposium (Daniel Schultz) 7. Nickname of Japanese Satellites (Mineo Wakita) 8. Correction (Mineo Wakita)
Message: 1 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:15:00 -0700 (PDT) From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL k9qho6762@sbcglobal.net To: amsat-bb@amsat.org, k7trkradio@charter.net Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H Message-ID: 1335125700.5004.YahooMailClassic@web82705.mail.mud.yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Ted,
Stephan gives some great comments on all three radios.
As for the 847 on HF, I think there is a audio clip on the internet comparing the 847 and TenTec Corsair II receivers. I have both of these rigs and the difference is very clear. Listening to my 847 on HF is not a pleasurable experience as the receiver is very noisy. For this reason, my old Corsair II does all HF work at least until I get a new HF rig. Eham reviews on the Corsair attest to its great receiver.
As for satellite operations, the 847 is a tough and a great rig. Mine has been running since the beginnings of AO-40 with no problems. It has some engineering mistakes like the AF gain not being linear along with other quirks but I've gotten my investment back many times over.
If you've got the cash, I would read the QST review on the 9100 and make an executive decision.
GL
Mike (K9QHO)
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:10:57 -0700 From: "Ted" k7trkradio@charter.net To: "'WILLIAMS MICHAEL'" k9qho6762@sbcglobal.net, amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H Message-ID: 47A336B34C124F9DA426E8D9D2E7AA62@HamComputer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks Michael,
The 9100 is not in the cards unless, after the divorce, my lawyer is better than my wife's !!!
73, Ted
-----Original Message----- From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL [mailto:k9qho6762@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 1:15 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; k7trkradio@charter.net Subject: Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
Ted,
Stephan gives some great comments on all three radios.
As for the 847 on HF, I think there is a audio clip on the internet comparing the 847 and TenTec Corsair II receivers. I have both of these rigs and the difference is very clear. Listening to my 847 on HF is not a pleasurable experience as the receiver is very noisy. For this reason, my old Corsair II does all HF work at least until I get a new HF rig. Eham reviews on the Corsair attest to its great receiver.
As for satellite operations, the 847 is a tough and a great rig. Mine has been running since the beginnings of AO-40 with no problems. It has some engineering mistakes like the AF gain not being linear along with other quirks but I've gotten my investment back many times over.
If you've got the cash, I would read the QST review on the 9100 and make an executive decision.
GL
Mike (K9QHO)
Message: 3 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:18:59 -0500 From: "Alan P. Biddle" APBIDDLE@UNITED.NET To: "'WILLIAMS MICHAEL'" k9qho6762@sbcglobal.net, amsat-bb@amsat.org, k7trkradio@charter.net Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H Message-ID: 85EC8F8A1F574F1193BF62CE97B86A0C@WA4SCA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mike,
When I bought my FT-847 in 1998, I got the optional mechanical SSB filters. I left in the stock filters for a few days, and then switched to the optional ones. It made a significant difference, both in reception, and when using the speech processor. The stock filters are still in the box in the basement.
73s,
Alan WA4SCA
PS Just converted completely to the Flex VU-5K, which is truly a whole new ballgame.
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of WILLIAMS MICHAEL Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 3:15 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; k7trkradio@charter.net Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
Ted,
Stephan gives some great comments on all three radios.
As for the 847 on HF, I think there is a audio clip on the internet comparing the 847 and TenTec Corsair II receivers. I have both of these rigs and the difference is very clear. Listening to my 847 on HF is not a pleasurable experience as the receiver is very noisy. For this reason, my old Corsair II does all HF work at least until I get a new HF rig. Eham reviews on the Corsair attest to its great receiver.
As for satellite operations, the 847 is a tough and a great rig. Mine has been running since the beginnings of AO-40 with no problems. It has some engineering mistakes like the AF gain not being linear along with other quirks but I've gotten my investment back many times over.
If you've got the cash, I would read the QST review on the 9100 and make an executive decision.
GL
Mike (K9QHO)
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Message: 4 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:50:51 -0500 From: Wyatt Dirks wyattdirks@msn.com To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AC0RA/m Message-ID: BAY151-W3632E391117BA18917F2D7CD200@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks to all who worked me yesterday while I was on the EN21/22 gridline. I think I worked everyone that had emailed me and wanted the grids plus a few more.
I have uploaded all contacts to LOTW using AC0RA but who know how long it may take to show up. If you don't see it in there soon let me know and I can try agn.
If you want a paper QSL just shoot me an email with qso data and I will send a card your way and no need for sase or return QSL.
73 Wyatt AC0RA
Message: 5 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:19:45 -0500 From: Floyd Rodgers kc5qbc@swbell.net Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H Message-ID: 4F94CA51.6000909@swbell.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
All I can say is me too. I bought the Collins mechanical filters and the difference was astounding on both transmit and receive. Had many comments on the change.Best $300 I ever spent.
Message: 6 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:50:14 -0400 From: "Daniel Schultz" n8fgv@usa.net To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Cc: qex@arrl.org, amsat-fox@alum.wpi.edu Subject: [amsat-bb] First Call for Papers for 2012 Symposium Message-ID: 528qDwDxo3472S03.1335153014@web03.cms.usa.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
This is the first call for papers for the 2012 AMSAT Annual Meeting and Space Symposium to be held in Orlando, Florida on the weekend of October 26-28, 2012. Proposals for papers, symposium presentations and poster presentations are invited on any topic of interest to the amateur satellite community. We request a tentative title of your presentation as soon as possible, with final copy to be submitted by October 1 for inclusion in the printed proceedings. Abstracts and papers should be sent to Dan Schultz, N8FGV, at n8fgv@amsat.org
Message: 7 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:51:39 +0900 From: "Mineo Wakita" ei7m-wkt@asahi-net.or.jp To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Nickname of Japanese Satellites Message-ID: F7A08DF6C7C44AA18C8855101ECFDA0B@FM4D8C73527130 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp"; reply-type=original
Akari --- Light Akatsuki --- Dawn Akebono --- The beginning Fuji --- Mt. Fuji Hayabusa --- Falcon Hitomi --- Eyes Horyu --- Big bird such as Dragon Ibuki --- Breath Kagayaki --- Brightness Kaguya --- Moon Princess Kibo --- Hope Kiku --- Chrysanthemum Kiseki --- Bright tide Kodama --- Echo Komolebi --- Sunshine filtering through foliage Kounotori --- White stork Kukai --- Sky and See Maido --- Always thank you Negai --- Wish Raiko --- Drum of the thunder Rising --- God of the thunder Shizuku --- Drop of the water Suzaku --- God of the south Tsubame --- Swallow
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
Message: 8 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:43:49 +0900 From: "Mineo Wakita" ei7m-wkt@asahi-net.or.jp To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Correction Message-ID: 59C0D3E3C86244489CEB9783E5EECF42@FM4D8C73527130 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp"; reply-type=original
Kukai --- Sky and Sea
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 128
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb