8 Feb
2013
8 Feb
'13
12:11 a.m.
I wonder if they considered that it may be significantly more reflective?
73, Drew KO4MA
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Tony Langdon vk3jed@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/02/13 7:49 AM, Bob- W7LRD wrote:
maybe "asteroid bounce"? (EAE) 73 Bob W7LRD
Someone on the moonbounce reflector crunched the numbers and came up with a path loss figure something like 51dB worse than EME, if I recall. The small cross section area was the killer.
Still, nothing ventured, nothing gained. :)
-- 73 de Tony VK3JED http://vkradio.com
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb