-----Original Message----- From: Mark Johns, K0JM k0jm.mark@gmail.com To: Ray Soifer rsoifer1@aol.com Cc: ricardoea4zk@gmail.com ricardoea4zk@gmail.com; k8bl@ameritech.net k8bl@ameritech.net; xe1fze@hotmail.com xe1fze@hotmail.com; rwmcgwier@gmail.com rwmcgwier@gmail.com; john@papays.com john@papays.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Tue, Aug 24, 2021 9:22 am Subject: [AMSAT-BB] Re: FT4 and CW on RS-44\
The original AMSAT Journal article (May/June 2020) on experiments with digital modes suggested 5 kHz up from the bottom of the passband. That won't interfere with the beacon. -- Mark D. Johns, KØJM AMSAT Ambassador & News Service Editor Brooklyn Park, MN USA EN35hd -----------------------------------------------"Heaven goes by favor; if it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in." ---Mark Twain
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:46 AM Ray Soifer via AMSAT-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org wrote:
Some users have computer Doppler correction ,others do not. Asa practical matter both need to be accommodated. I suggest a digimodes segment near the top end of the RS-44 downlink because the beacon is at the bottom end. 73 Ray W2RS
-----Original Message----- From: Ricardo Navarrete ricardoea4zk@gmail.com To: Bob Liddy (K8BL) k8bl@ameritech.net Cc: Humberto González xe1fze@hotmail.com; Robert McGwier rwmcgwier@gmail.com; Ray Soifer rsoifer1@aol.com; john@papays.com; Amsat BB amsat-bb@amsat.org, bothe Sent: Mon, Aug 23, 2021 3:08 pm Subject: [AMSAT-BB] Re: FT4 and CW on RS-44\
Probably you are right Bob, bit this is extracted from author web page..... FT4 and FT8 are digital protocols designed for rapid and accuratecommunication between amateur radio stations, particularly in weak-signal conditions. That is what I said that this protocol is good in very low.angle passes but it has non sense over medium-low or medium angle passes. One thing I'm completely sure, we need something similar to a band plan, order and method keep things in place..... 73 On Mon, Aug 23, 2021, 23:47 Bob Liddy (K8BL) k8bl@ameritech.net wrote:
Rick EA4M, My understanding is that FT4 was developed to provide QSOs in half the time as FT8especially for Digital Contesting. But, it makes more sense for SAT operating sinceQSOs need to be quicker due to the several propagation issues that occur. Perhapsagreed-upon freqs need to be implemented to promote sharing of the Bandpass withouttoo much interference. GL/73, Bob K8BL
On Monday, August 23, 2021, 03:50:39 PM EDT, Ricardo Navarrete ricardoea4zk@gmail.com wrote:
BTW I can't understand the use if FT4 in satellite even in HF.... I always thought that FTx modes where developed for extremely bad propagation conditions or for those who have a very poor setup to help them enjoying ham radio, I could accept FT4 in satellites to complete a extreme QSO under negative elevation in both sides but not to have a simple QSO in a good pass or with a normal setup. It is just my opinion.. On Mon, Aug 23, 2021, 21:15 Humberto González xe1fze@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all, those suggestions are right, the aproach of a band plan can help a lot, nevertheless as others mentioned, all the actions we decide to do will be effective if we follow the rule of listen before TX, I do FT-4, and CW, and with a full duplex station there is no way you make interference and if you doit is intentional. Regarding the power, FT4 can run with less power than cw and ssb, I have made qso's with 0% of the power of the rig, but again, if we abuse about the power of TX no matter the mode we used, we will hogged the sat power. Respect, Improve our operating skills and a band plan will work very good. 73Bert / XE1HG De: Robert McGwier rwmcgwier@gmail.com Enviado: lunes, 23 de agosto de 2021 06:53 p. m. Para: Ray Soifer rsoifer1@aol.com CC: ricardoea4zk@gmail.com ricardoea4zk@gmail.com; john@papays.com john@papays.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org amsat-bb@amsat.org Asunto: [AMSAT-BB] Re: FT4 and CW on RS-44\ Hear hear! On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 12:30 PM Ray Soifer via AMSAT-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org wrote:
For a great many years, operation with key down continuous power was strongly discouraged on the linear transponder sats precisely because such modes hogged the sat's power. There is so much activity on the FT modes, however, that John is probably right that it's time to revisit that idea. Not only should a digital band segment be identified as John suggests, but a simple means of holding down power output should be adopted. Here's one idea. Since CW has approximately a 50% duty cycle, why not take your CW power and cut it in half for use on FT4? 73 Ray W2RS
-----Original Message-----From: Ricardo Navarrete ricardoea4zk@gmail.com To: john@papays.com Cc: Amsat BB amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Mon, Aug 23, 2021 8:53 am Subject: [AMSAT-BB] Re: FT4 and CW on RS-44 's Hello Johnth I'm totally agree with you, we were talking about that in our local sat group and we have to lay the foundations for proper transponder management before everyone become crazy. Maybe a general "band plan" for all the SATs will be a solution...... My two cents Rick EA4M On Mon, Aug 23, 2021, 17:48 john@papays.com wrote:
FT4 activity on RS-44 has been increasing. FT4 can be heard just about everywhere in the passband and this can create problems for SSB and CW users. I have heard FT4 around 435668, 64x,639 and 620. The HF bands are divided into mode segments so CW,SSB and Digital are not in the same areas. On RS-44 there are no segments so it is all modes everywhere. Several days ago I listened to WB9YIG trying to work N1DM around 435639, but every time N1DM would give his callsign a FT4 signal would be on top of him. They finally gave up. I doubt if it was intentional. The FT4 computer was just doing what it was programmed to do. The operator may have not even been listening (not a good idea on sats). Also keep in mind that a FT4 signal is key down continuous carrier, much more demanding on satellite power than SSB or to some extent CW. The beauty of FT4 is supposed to be that you don't need a strong signal to decode, so flea power should work well.It would be good if all the FT4 operations would move to one area on the transponder. I suggest 435610-435620 because it is the least used area. The top end has become very crowded lately due to some rovers operating in that area. This has encouraged others to operate there as well. Maybe some others have a better suggestion.FT4 is not the only issue on RS-44. CW activity has been increasing as well. CW and SSB can co-exist, however, CW ops cannot be using CW filters and expect not to interfere with SSB stations. Again we don't have a CW segment so using CW filters are not going to be appropriate. Please use a SSB RX filter when operating CW and make sure you don't hear SSB in your passband before starting up. Same for SSB stations. Don't start up if you hear CW in your passband. Just move to a clear spot.If you are not computer conrtolled for doppler, you are going to be moving in the passband. And you are likely going to slide into another QSO, especially now that RS-44 activity has increased. Please try to keep your position in the passband stable. If your radio can be computer controlled, please take advantage of that so that you don't move. You never have to send dits, whistle or blow into the mic when you are computer controlled. And you won't be transmitting on top of somebody.Just my opinion of course. 73, John K8YSE
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Acceptable Use and Privacy Policies available at https://www.amsat.org/about-amsat/
View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/amsat-bb@amsat.org To unsubscribe send an email to amsat-bb-leave(a)amsat.org Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Acceptable Use and Privacy Policies available at https://www.amsat.org/about-amsat/
View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/amsat-bb@amsat.org To unsubscribe send an email to amsat-bb-leave(a)amsat.org Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org -----------------------------------------------------------
Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Acceptable Use and Privacy Policies available at https://www.amsat.org/about-amsat/
View archives of this mailing list at https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/amsat-bb@amsat.org To unsubscribe send an email to amsat-bb-leave(a)amsat.org Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at https://mailman.amsat.org