Yes, that's right -- it turns out that, given a target dipole (or torque), and volume, you can adjust the coil resistance by selecting the right wire gauge. If you run twice as many turns, you get twice the resistance, and so (for a fixed voltage) half the current. That gives you the same dipole, regardless. Fundamentally, the dipole is proportional to the mass of copper that's in the coil.
It also turns out that the power required to generate a given dipole varies as the square of the dipole, given constant geometry. Let that guide your ADCS sizing!
-- Luke Stras (VA3LNS)
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Bruninga bruninga@usna.edu wrote:
I keep coming up with the number of turns of a torque coil vanishing with respect to torque (for a given wire size).
Given that Torque = A x B x I x n where A is area, B is field, I is current and n is number of turns.
But I is inversely proportional to the length of wire (resistance). I = V/R but R is proportional to n.
Hence the number of turns. So I is proportional to V/n.
But V is fixed in the cubesat, (5v) area is fixed (where we can put the coil) and so plugging in,
T = A x B x V/n x n and the n’s cancel.
So I can get the same torque with –any- number of turns for a given size wire.
What changes with turns, of course, is the current. So to save spacecraft power, the more turns, the less current, and thus, the least power for the same torque.
Interesting result.
We ended up with 600 turns of #34 wire to keep the current at 25 mA so we can drive it directly from a CPU pin.
I wonder where’s the limit? Infinitie number of turns… Zero current? I guess you run out of space.
AH HA! Yes, that was it. We started with #30 wire but it took so many turns to get to below the 25 mA, that there wasn’t room for the coil. So we went to smaller wire and ended up with the #34 to give us a ¼” thick coil with 600 turns to give 25 mA.
But I just always found it interesting that once you have chosen the wire size, the number of turns is only determined by the current you want. The Torque is constant.
Bob, WB4APR _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb