![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9c6183e584ca8305ec07697b025908f6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Thank to all for the good info. Pity the Chinese did not follow best practice. Appreciate the info very much! 73, N0AN
Hasan
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dave Webb KB1PVH [email protected] wrote:
145.67 is in the Miscellaneous and experimental section not the satellite sub band. You can thank the Chinese for not using the satellite sub band.
See here http://www.arrl.org/band-plan
145.50-145.80 Miscellaneous and experimental modes 145.80-146.00 OSCAR subband Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S9
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 11:00 AM Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB < [email protected]> wrote:
There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater (simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this a shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the Trustee?
73, N0AN
Hasan _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb