Great point!
Hi Angelo,
Jeff - K2AK (X-K7WIN)
-----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Angelo Glorioso Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:57 AM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: D STAR
When GO32 was running, we were able to send and receive data at 9600 bps. DSTAR voice. on 444 is 2400bps and data is 4800bps gsm if I am correct.
So, why would it not work via satellite other than having to get 5 kc steps reduced to 1k or less.
73 de Angelo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon JC Pearce" gordonjcp@gjcp.net To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:22 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: D STAR
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:46:24AM -0600, damon runion wrote:
Well back in the days of AM and when SSB came out it was the same thinking then BUT what has happened to AM . Same thing with DSTAR it is growing and will grow . Thats what makes ham radio so much fun, there is something for everyone 73,s Damon
But the difference there is that *anyone* can make an SSB rig. Only one manufacturer is allowed to make AMBE codecs, and they will only sell to a handful of approved radio manufacturers.
It is illegal to make your own DStar radio, without buying the AMBE codec from DVSI. That sort of thing has no place in amateur radio.
-- Gordonjcp MM0YEQ
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb